<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>189595</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-08-20 14:21 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-editors/kile-2.0_beta1 version bump</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-08-22 00:16:31 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://kile.sourceforge.net/download.php?get=http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/kile/kile-2.0b1.tar.bz2?download</bug_file_loc>
          
          
          <priority>P5</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>rb6@duke.edu</reporter>
          <assigned_to>kde@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>tex@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rb6@duke.edu</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-20 14:21:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Kile is a IDE for LaTeX documents.  The new version apparently has many improvements and it would be great to have an ebuild to test.

Reproducible: Always</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>philantrop@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-21 18:31:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;ve added app-editors/kile-2.0_beta1 to the tree. It&apos;s currently package.mask&apos;ed because it currently doesn&apos;t feature localisations in contrast to the previous versions and because it&apos;s a beta release. 

Thus, you&apos;ll have to add it to /etc/portage/package.unmask to try it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rb6@duke.edu</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-21 18:37:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Wow, that was quick :)

Thanks.  I&apos;ll try it and report back.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rb6@duke.edu</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-21 19:40:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Could a png USE flag be added that pulls in dvipng?

There&apos;s a new previewing option that uses it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>philantrop@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-22 00:16:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; Could a png USE flag be added that pulls in dvipng?
&gt; There&apos;s a new previewing option that uses it.

Yes, I&apos;m aware of that. Please take a look at the post-install message - we not only would have to add quite a few USE-conditional dependencies but what would we draw in if you had the &quot;png&quot; USE flag set? dvipng or Imagemagick? Or &quot;pdf&quot; - acroread or kpdf? And so on. 

We usually don&apos;t add USE-conditional dependencies for optional runtime dependencies because they rarely ever make much sense. 

Instead, we usually add post-install messages as in this case to inform our users about the options they have. If you use the ELOG_* options in /etc/make.conf smartly (e. g. I get all messages mailed to me), it&apos;s rather easy to follow up if you face any problems.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>