188092 2007-08-08 11:49 0000 media-gfx/iscan installs broken udev rules 2007-09-03 21:01:23 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 ray@apollo.lv sbriesen@gentoo.org ray@apollo.lv 2007-08-08 11:49:04 0000 If package media-gfx/iscan is installed and Epson USB Multi Functional Printer (MFP) is connected to computer, then installation of this printer in CUPS works without problems but any attept to print return timeout error. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. emerge media-gfx/iscan 2. connect Epson USB MFP & turn it on 3. install printer in CUPS 4. print testpage Actual Results: No reaction from printer CUPS printer status show timeout error Expected Results: Test page printed version of media-gfx/iscan - 2.7.0 (but I suspect other may have same problem) Cause: udev rules from media-gfx/iscan package change group of printer part of MFP from 'lp' to 'scanner', but CUPS expect printer belongs to 'lp' group ray@apollo.lv 2007-08-08 11:52:42 0000 Created an attachment (id=127274) Simple workaround Patch to /etc/udev/rules.d/99-iscan.rules file, to workaround tgis problem sbriesen@gentoo.org 2007-08-08 23:03:17 0000 ok, accepted. I will include this patch asap, but I'm not sure if I should rev-bump it for this fix, which affects only very few people... zzam@gentoo.org 2007-08-18 16:56:18 0000 Please: if you change anything there, also move the file away from name 99-*.rules to something other. If you keep the rules as they are the number needs to be >50, as 50-udev.rules else overwrites the GROUP property (at the moment). sbriesen@gentoo.org 2007-08-19 22:14:00 0000 there's a new release already there. So I will put all changes to this new version first and then I try to patch the older versions also. btw: I had the rules-number at 75 before. But then I found: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 53211 2. Mai 16:50 99-libgphoto2.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 61163 2. Mai 16:56 99-libsane.rules so I thought it would be good to have it also at 99. Any suggestions for the number? 70s? 60s? But please not 50s. zzam@gentoo.org 2007-08-21 12:15:38 0000 Well, there seems not yet be some approved number scheme. For new stuff without any needs I suggest 40. And in this case some packages seem to use 55. If you do not want to do multiple changes you can also keep it now on 99 as the others did, and change that once we know what exactly we want to do :) sbriesen@gentoo.org 2007-08-23 18:37:15 0000 ok. ;-) after some final checks, I will commit new version this weekend. sbriesen@gentoo.org 2007-09-03 21:01:23 0000 fixed + new version in portage. 127274 2007-08-08 11:52 0000 Simple workaround 99-iscan.rules.patch text/plain aXNjYW4gbXVzdCBub3QgdG91Y2ggcHJpbnRlciBwYXJ0IG9mIG11bHRpIGZ1bmN0aW9uYWwgcHJp bnRlcnMKClNpZ25lZC1vZmYtYnk6IFJhaW1vbmRzIENpY2FucyA8cmF5QGFwb2xsby5sdj4KCgot LS0gOTktaXNjYW4ucnVsZXMub2xkCTIwMDctMDgtMDggMDA6MDY6MjQuMDAwMDAwMDAwICswMzAw CisrKyA5OS1pc2Nhbi5ydWxlcwkyMDA3LTA4LTA4IDEzOjQzOjU2LjAwMDAwMDAwMCArMDMwMApA QCAtMiw2ICsyLDcgQEAKICMKIEFDVElPTiE9ImFkZCIsIEdPVE89ImlzY2FuX3J1bGVzX2VuZCIK IFNVQlNZU1RFTSE9InVzYioiLCBHT1RPPSJpc2Nhbl9ydWxlc19lbmQiCitLRVJORUw9PSJscFsw LTldKiIsIEdPVE89ImlzY2FuX3J1bGVzX2VuZCIKIAogIyBTRUlLTyBFUFNPTiBDb3Jwb3JhdGlv biB8IFBlcmZlY3Rpb24gIDYzNiAoR1QtNzAwMCkKIEFUVFJTe2lkVmVuZG9yfT09IjA0YjgiLCBB VFRSU3tpZFByb2R1Y3R9PT0iMDEwMSIsIE1PREU9IjA2NjAiLCBHUk9VUD0ic2Nhbm5lciIK