187559 2007-08-03 00:55 0000 sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2 keywording 2007-09-21 13:53:15 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED STABLEREQ P2 normal --- 168317 186953 187984 1 dsd@gentoo.org kernel-misc@gentoo.org chrschmitt@gmail.com corsair@gentoo.org tester@gentoo.org dsd@gentoo.org 2007-08-03 00:55:33 0000 ppc: please mark ~ppc amd64/x86: please mark stable Prerequisite: bug #186953 We have no known regressions with this kernel. Additionally it fixes a few bugs that we haven't been able to fix in previous releases: bug #177952, bug #178821, bug #180684, bug #181757, bug #185491, bug #185983 josejx@gentoo.org 2007-08-08 11:13:28 0000 Marked ~ppc. I'd like to go stable with this sooner rather than later, we've had vanilla sources-2.6.22 marked ~ppc since it was available. I'm not sure how I missed this one. :) beandog@gentoo.org 2007-08-11 03:09:38 0000 amd64 stable corsair@gentoo.org 2007-08-12 13:56:42 0000 beandog: I think this bug was about marking as ~amd64, was it? Just want to be sure there is nothing in stable that shouldn't be there... tester@gentoo.org 2007-08-12 15:01:08 0000 This new kernel add a new version of the wireless extensions (22), should we stabilize a new version of the wireless tools ? fauli@gentoo.org 2007-08-12 21:01:18 0000 (In reply to comment #3) > beandog: I think this bug was about marking as ~amd64, was it? Just want to be > sure there is nothing in stable that shouldn't be there... Markus, please read comment #0. :) fauli@gentoo.org 2007-08-13 07:12:59 0000 x86 stable and closing chrschmitt@gmail.com 2007-09-21 13:53:15 0000 I think this should be marked stable on ppc, too. I encountered no issues here.