<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>187529</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-08-02 19:24 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>=media-sound/bmpx-0.40.0 and dev-cpp/libsexymm keywording</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-10-06 13:52:16 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>ssuominen@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>ppc@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ssuominen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-02 19:24:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Please keyword,

dev-cpp/libsexymm ~ppc ~ppc64
media-sound/bmpx ~ppc ~ppc64

Missed repoman warnings because of package.mask, shrug.. Sorry! But it&apos;s good idea to retest bmpx, it&apos;s been mostly rewritten (again)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-10 17:53:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;ve dropped keywords from bmpx, as it currently segfaults just too often. That&apos;s no fun. 0.3x series produced segfaults while running and 0.40 now segfaults on startup. This might be a toolchain issue though..

I&apos;ll retest, when a user requests so.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-10 17:54:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>that was for ppc64, not ppc.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ssuominen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-11 10:26:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; I&apos;ve dropped keywords from bmpx, as it currently segfaults just too often.
&gt; That&apos;s no fun. 0.3x series produced segfaults while running and 0.40 now
&gt; segfaults on startup. This might be a toolchain issue though..

Yeah.. Since BMPx is using large amount of C++ libs it&apos;s easy to break it by e.g. mixing GCC versions.. some libs built with GCC 4.1.2 and some 4.2.0 for example. Basically, to get something valid debug info out of it you have to ensure &quot;entire system&quot; is built with one single compiler.. 
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-06 13:52:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Added ~ppc</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>