18724 2003-04-03 22:45 0000 Glade doesn't compile in gnome db support 2003-04-22 08:35:09 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Development unspecified x86 Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 lichte@gmail.com gnome@gentoo.org lichte@gmail.com 2003-04-03 22:45:10 0000 I emerged both libgda and libgnomedb but when emerging glade I noticed that during the configure process that it says that gnome db is not included. After running glade, I see that gnome db isn't there. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Expected Results: Gnome DB support in glade. lichte@gmail.com 2003-04-03 22:46:07 0000 I'm using ~x86 and the newest gnomedb and glade ebuilds. foser@gentoo.org 2003-04-12 14:16:11 0000 the newest glade2 ebuild at that time was way older then the latest (needed) gnomedb ebuilds. Anyway, i dunno about all this, forcing gnomedb seems a bit too much for the casual user. What would be an appropriate useflag ? lichte@gmail.com 2003-04-13 05:59:06 0000 Would a casual user use glade? I can see not including it because glade and gnomedb aren't always in sync and I'd suggest gnomedb as a use flag, but I'm not married to that idea ;). Whatever you guys come up with would be fine. foser@gentoo.org 2003-04-13 07:14:04 0000 well i consider myself a casual glade user and i never needed gnomedb stuff (i have honestly no idea what it does). There seems to be no suitable useflag, so maybe a local useflag would be appropriate here. lichte@gmail.com 2003-04-13 09:06:28 0000 Ah, I was thinking you meant casual users, not developers ;-) Again, I have no probs with gnomedb not being in glade by default. I'm just tired of rewriting the ebuilds to include it. I'd be very happy to set a use variable in my make.conf by hand in order to get gnomedb support in glade. Thanks for all your work! liquidx@gentoo.org 2003-04-22 08:35:09 0000 i've added optional gnomedb support to glade-2.0.0-r1 along with some other cleanups. it is not enabled by default. this is a local useflag.