<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>187057</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-07-29 19:30 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Please stabilise app-admin/eselect-emacs-1.1</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-08-25 23:31:34 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>STABLEREQ</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>ulm@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>emacs@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>mips@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>s390@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ulm@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-29 19:30:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>eselect-emacs-1.1 is in the tree since one month. This version doesn&apos;t need workarounds for bug #172472 and bug #172475 anymore (since these have been fixed in eselect-1.0.10).

It also includes the ctags.eselect module now (and dev-util/ctags depends on it). Thanks in advance for stabilising.

vapier: m68k is yours.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-30 06:55:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-30 11:22:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-30 12:21:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>armin76@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-30 17:59:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>alpha/ia64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-30 18:00:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable for HPPA.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>metalgod@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-01 04:04:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 done</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ulm@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-01 05:28:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Not yet fixed ...
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-13 20:04:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ulm@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-25 15:18:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>arm/m68k/sh stable, thanks vapier.

Still missing, but not even keyworded yet: mips s390
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>vapier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-25 23:03:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>erp, mips still needs love</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-25 23:09:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Hooray for the bug spam</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ulm@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-25 23:12:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>s390 not done ...
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ulm@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-25 23:31:34 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>O.K., for the remaining two archs it probably makes no sense to have separate KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ bugs open.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 174882 ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>