186657 2007-07-26 08:15 0000 media-gfx/gimp: 2.2.16 regression after PSD security fix 2007-09-08 15:31:16 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Security Vulnerabilities unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456042 [] jaervosz P2 enhancement --- 1 falco@gentoo.org security@gentoo.org hanno@gentoo.org security@gentoo.org falco@gentoo.org 2007-07-26 08:15:31 0000 Hi, i wish to make a call for marking gimp-2.2.17 stable because of a regression introduced by the PSD fix (see security bug 182047 and GLSA 200707-09) (crash and division by zero in some PSD files, no security risk). falco@gentoo.org 2007-07-31 15:10:04 0000 ping Hanno? hanno@gentoo.org 2007-07-31 19:03:48 0000 Arches, please stabilize. jer@gentoo.org 2007-07-31 19:39:12 0000 Stable for HPPA: media-gfx/gimp-2.2.17 falco@gentoo.org 2007-07-31 20:39:39 0000 thanks Hanno gustavoz@gentoo.org 2007-07-31 21:37:39 0000 sparc stable. armin76@gentoo.org 2007-08-01 13:12:03 0000 alpha/ia64/x86 stable corsair@gentoo.org 2007-08-01 19:45:59 0000 ppc64 stable dertobi123@gentoo.org 2007-08-01 20:42:11 0000 ppc stable jaervosz@gentoo.org 2007-08-14 10:01:57 0000 Reassigning to security since it's a regression in a security bump. angelos@gentoo.org 2007-08-15 14:49:22 0000 amd64 stable hanno@gentoo.org 2007-08-15 16:06:48 0000 security, wanna update the glsa? (to suggest 2.2.17 and also 2.3.19 for ~ and mips-users) jaervosz@gentoo.org 2007-08-15 17:27:18 0000 I'll update once I return home from my extended weekend trip if noone has done it sooner. hanno@gentoo.org 2007-09-04 20:36:28 0000 security? jaervosz@gentoo.org 2007-09-08 15:31:16 0000 Hanno sorry for the delay. After taking a closer look at it I don't think we need to update the GLSA. All users following the instructions in the GLSA should be safe security wise. Feel free to reopen if there is something I have overlooked.