<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>186277</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-07-22 21:57 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>dev-java/{ibm-jdk-bin|ibm-jre-bin}-{1.4.2.8|1.5.0.5} affected by GLSA 200705-23</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-06-26 13:06:55 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Security</product>
          <component>Vulnerabilities</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2006-004.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>B4? [glsa]</status_whiteboard>
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>215614</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>caster@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>security@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>java@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caster@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-22 21:57:36 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>At least on my x86, the testcases found at $URL are crashing it similarly to Sun JDK (bug 178851, I think IBM licenses most of their code anyway).

I&apos;m bumping to 1.4.2.9 which I found to be released and that has it apparently fixed (safe java exception about bad ICC data instead of crash). But we&apos;ll need to wait for update of the 1.5 slot.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caster@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-22 22:10:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Arches please stabilize:
dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.4.2.9
dev-java/ibm-jre-bin-1.4.2.9

Sorry to amd64 which just stabilized 1.4.2.8 before I found out about the new one :)
You can get the distfiles via ssh from d.g.o/~caster/tmp to avoid hassle with IBM accounts.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-23 07:48:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; You can get the distfiles via ssh from d.g.o/~caster/tmp to avoid hassle with
&gt; IBM accounts.

 To be honest: This type of download restriction is a fucking piece of shit and
I just hate it.  If I ever meet the responsible person I will hit him/her hard
in the face.

x86 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-25 05:27:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-27 22:56:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>beandog@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-12 14:36:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caster@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-21 10:13:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>OK, so IBM released 1.5.0.5a which is just security fixes and apparently fixes this one vulnerability.

Added to tree, arches please stabilize:
dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.5.0.5a
dev-java/ibm-jre-bin-1.5.0.5a

Note that jre SLOT 1.5 was not stable yet, but 1) 1.5.0.5 was there in ~arch for two months and 1.5.0.5a is only security fix (according to changelog) and 2) jre is just a subset of jdk which is stable, so I think there&apos;s no need to wait 30 days.
You can get the distfiles again per comment 1. (i&apos;m still uploading tho so you might have to wait if you are too fast :)

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-21 18:04:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-22 16:00:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-29 10:11:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>beandog@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-09-08 01:23:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caster@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-09-08 01:46:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Which was last arch.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aetius@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-09-09 22:23:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;ll vote yes - the linked URL is talking about exploitable buffer overflows.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>py@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-09-12 08:37:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>voting yes too, maybe combined with the sun jdk/jre draft.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rbu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-26 13:06:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>GLSA 200806-11</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>