184884 2007-07-10 18:20 0000 sys-apps/ed-0.6 version bump 2007-08-02 01:50:44 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED http://www.gnu.org/software/ed/ P2 enhancement --- 1 pipping@gentoo.org base-system@gentoo.org pipping@gentoo.org 2007-07-10 18:20:05 0000 ed-0.6 was released on 2007-06-29. vapier@gentoo.org 2007-07-10 20:10:01 0000 done, thanks for the info pipping@gentoo.org 2007-07-20 18:28:45 0000 ed-0.7 was released on 2007-07-18. pipping@gentoo.org 2007-08-01 17:53:04 0000 what's the status on this? vapier@gentoo.org 2007-08-01 21:04:11 0000 (1) you file new bug reports, you dont open old ones (2) stop going to every open bug you see and asking for status reports. if you want status reports, get a job as middle management where you can pester people underneath you who have no choice but to listen. pipping@gentoo.org 2007-08-02 01:50:44 0000 (In reply to comment #4) > (1) you file new bug reports, you dont open old ones There's a benefit from reopening this one which is that the bug is already assigned correctly and a trivial version bump is not the kind of thing that needs to be locked away and archived. On the other hand there's a good chance you've been using this bug tracker ten times longer than I have, so even if I don't immediately see your point I might try not to bug you more than necessary. > > (2) stop going to every open bug you see and asking for status reports. if you > want status reports, get a job as middle management where you can pester people > underneath you who have no choice but to listen. I did this to four bugs at once. While that might be two bugs too many, two's still not twenty or anything. I use Gentoo/Alt - that means I have an interest in having the ebuild in the main tree so it can be adopted, but I cannot test any of the `unprefixed` ebuilds on my machine - a mac. Secondly I'm not expecting anyone, especially in the case of this bug - *ED* - to invest a lot of time or to invest any time at all into something only I would benefit from - because that's not the case (although ed might be a bad example for something everybody benefits from). What I did is write a short comment. There was no swearing, no pushing, no nothing. And if whoever gets that comment via mail has a problem with getting that kind of *short* note - for the first time on this bug - considering it took me longer to write than him to read, that's just ridiculous.