<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>182551</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-06-19 08:45 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>gnome-base/gnome-2.18.0 needs some keywords loving on hppa</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-06-22 21:47:03 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>2007.0</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>jakub@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>hppa@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>gnome@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-19 08:45:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>gnome-base/gnome-2.18.0: nonsolvable depset(rdepends) keyword(~hppa) profile (default-linux/hppa/2007.0): solutions: [ &gt;=gnome-base/gnome-volume-manager-2.17.0, &gt;=gnome-extra/gnome-screensaver-2.18.0, &gt;=app-accessibility/orca-2.18, &gt;=gnome-extra/gnome-power-manager-2.18.0 ]</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-21 14:32:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Why were keywords for all of these dropped in the first place? Unbelievable that this keeps happening without notice to the relevant arch team..</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-21 14:58:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html

  &quot;Sometimes you may need to remove a keyword because of new unresolved 
   dependencies. If you do this, you _must_ file a bug notifying the 
   relevant arch teams.&quot;

For one thing, it&apos;s not clear for which dependencies the keywords were dropped in the first place, and secondly, the HPPA team wasn&apos;t notified. :\</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>remi@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-21 17:47:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I haven&apos;t looked at ChangeLogs or anything, but it&apos;s possible that if you keyworded those packages after we forked our gnome ebuilds, we may have forgotten to add those in our 2.18 ebuilds when we merged.

In which case it&apos;s an honest mistake.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-22 21:47:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; I haven&apos;t looked at ChangeLogs or anything, but it&apos;s possible that if you
&gt; keyworded those packages after we forked our gnome ebuilds, we may have
&gt; forgotten to add those in our 2.18 ebuilds when we merged.

*gnome-2.18.0 (09 Apr 2007)

  09 Apr 2007; Remi Cardona &lt;remi@gentoo.org&gt; +gnome-2.18.0.ebuild:
  gnome-2.18.0 meta ebuild

Shouldn&apos;t repoman have shown the breakage that early, i.e. when the 2.18 ebuilds were committed to CVS?

&gt; In which case it&apos;s an honest mistake.

I guess so. I am not one to suspect evil intentions so easily. :)

Fixed without merging or testing: if anyone had gnome-base/gnome on a ~hppa system (of which bugzilla shows no evidence) this issue would have come up months ago, so I think it&apos;s best to let nurture run its course and see what bugs simply re-keywording will bring. Naturally, I will be testing 2.18 on a stable HPPA system in due time.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>