<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>181792</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-06-12 16:53 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>dev-libs/nss-3.11.9: Ignored LDFLAGS: 6 files</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-08-13 16:44:03 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P5</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>arfrever@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>mozilla@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>arfrever@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-12 16:53:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>### List of files built with LDFLAGS ignored ###
/usr/lib/nss/libnssckbi.so.11
/usr/lib/nss/libfreebl3.so.11
/usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.11
/usr/lib/nss/libsmime3.so.11
/usr/lib/nss/libsoftokn3.so.11
/usr/lib/nss/libssl3.so.11
### End of list                              ###

Ignoring LDFLAGS increases files sizes and decreases performance.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-12 17:48:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>OK, that was about enough.

1/ Use common sense when filing bugs (like, what about mailing gentoo-dev mailing list first and asking about the best course of action here?
2/ If you have a patch, submit it *upstream* unless this is a *Gentoo-specific* issue.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>arfrever@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-13 00:21:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=143373)
nss-3.11.9-respect-LDFLAGS.patch

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>arfrever@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-13 00:21:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I have attached the patch.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>arfrever@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-08 17:55:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=145579)
nss-3.12-respect-LDFLAGS.patch

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-08 22:38:34 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>We currently don&apos;t have any policy that says we can&apos;t ignore LDFLAGS.  I&apos;d much rather this be discussed on g-dev@ before we start enforcing a policy that doesn&apos;t exist.  Thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>armin76@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-08-13 16:44:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fixed, thanks.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>143373</attachid>
            <date>2008-02-13 00:21 0000</date>
            <desc>nss-3.11.9-respect-LDFLAGS.patch</desc>
            <filename>nss-3.11.9-respect-LDFLAGS.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIG1vemlsbGEvc2VjdXJpdHkvY29yZWNvbmYvcnVsZXMubWsKKysrIG1vemlsbGEvc2VjdXJp
dHkvY29yZWNvbmYvcnVsZXMubWsKQEAgLTM1OSw3ICszNTksNyBAQAogaWZkZWYgWFBfT1MyX1ZB
Q1BQCiAJJChNS1NITElCKSAkKERMTEZMQUdTKSAkKExERkxBR1MpICQoT0JKUykgJChTVUJfU0hM
T0JKUykgJChMRF9MSUJTKSAkKEVYVFJBX0xJQlMpICQoRVhUUkFfU0hBUkVEX0xJQlMpICQoT1Nf
TElCUykKIGVsc2UKLQkkKE1LU0hMSUIpIC1vICRAICQoT0JKUykgJChTVUJfU0hMT0JKUykgJChM
RF9MSUJTKSAkKEVYVFJBX0xJQlMpICQoRVhUUkFfU0hBUkVEX0xJQlMpICQoT1NfTElCUykKKwkk
KE1LU0hMSUIpICQoTERGTEFHUykgLW8gJEAgJChPQkpTKSAkKFNVQl9TSExPQkpTKSAkKExEX0xJ
QlMpICQoRVhUUkFfTElCUykgJChFWFRSQV9TSEFSRURfTElCUykgJChPU19MSUJTKQogZW5kaWYK
IAljaG1vZCAreCAkQAogaWZlcSAoJChPU19UQVJHRVQpLERhcndpbikK
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>145579</attachid>
            <date>2008-03-08 17:55 0000</date>
            <desc>nss-3.12-respect-LDFLAGS.patch</desc>
            <filename>nss-3.12-respect-LDFLAGS.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIG1vemlsbGEvc2VjdXJpdHkvY29yZWNvbmYvcnVsZXMubWsKKysrIG1vemlsbGEvc2VjdXJp
dHkvY29yZWNvbmYvcnVsZXMubWsKQEAgLTM0MSw3ICszNDEsNyBAQAogZW5kaWYJIyBNU1ZDIHdp
dGggbWFuaWZlc3QgdG9vbAogZW5kaWYKIGVsc2UKLQkkKE1LU0hMSUIpIC1vICRAICQoT0JKUykg
JChTVUJfU0hMT0JKUykgJChMRF9MSUJTKSAkKEVYVFJBX0xJQlMpICQoRVhUUkFfU0hBUkVEX0xJ
QlMpICQoT1NfTElCUykKKwkkKE1LU0hMSUIpICQoTERGTEFHUykgLW8gJEAgJChPQkpTKSAkKFNV
Ql9TSExPQkpTKSAkKExEX0xJQlMpICQoRVhUUkFfTElCUykgJChFWFRSQV9TSEFSRURfTElCUykg
JChPU19MSUJTKQogCWNobW9kICt4ICRACiBpZmVxICgkKE9TX1RBUkdFVCksRGFyd2luKQogaWZk
ZWYgTUFQRklMRQo=
</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>