<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>181102</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-06-06 16:42 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>dev-java/jgraph-5.10.1.2 version bump request</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-06-08 23:10:26 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Java</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.jgraph.com/jgraphlog.html</bug_file_loc>
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>duaneg@dghda.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>java@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>duaneg@dghda.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-06 16:42:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>JGraph is now at version 5.10.1.2. Simply renaming the ebuild accordingly works for me here.

I&apos;ve done some minimal testing, as requested at the &quot;getting involved&quot; page:
 * compiled with sun-jdk-1.4, sun-jdk-1.5, sun-jdk-1.6, blackdown-jdk-1.4.2
 * recompiled the only dependency in the tree (dev-java/microba)

Notes:
 * I&apos;ve only compiled on amd64, since that is the only arch I have to hand.
 * The API documentation is installed in &quot;/usr/share/doc/${PF}/html/api&quot; not &quot;/usr/share/${PF}/html/api&quot;. However it looks like the former is correct and the web-page is wrong.
 * There is a warning while compiling the javadoc, but nothing serious I think.


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caster@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-06 20:53:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #0)
&gt;  * The API documentation is installed in &quot;/usr/share/doc/${PF}/html/api&quot; not
&gt; &quot;/usr/share/${PF}/html/api&quot;. However it looks like the former is correct and
&gt; the web-page is wrong.

Yes page was wrong. Fixed in CVS, thanks.

&gt;  * There is a warning while compiling the javadoc, but nothing serious I think.

Not sure if I saw a package without warnings in javadoc :) </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>duaneg@dghda.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-06 22:45:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; Not sure if I saw a package without warnings in javadoc :) 

Yes, you have a point there :)
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>betelgeuse@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-08 20:13:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Hi Duane \o/

In it goes.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>duaneg@dghda.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-08 23:10:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Cheers man, much appreciated! Will let folks know if/when new versions are released.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>