<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>180101</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-05-28 11:35 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-editors/jedit-4.2-r2 - wrong cleanup proposal after merge</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-05-29 09:23:44 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>frank.ralph.reiser@gmail.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>java@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>frank.ralph.reiser@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-05-28 11:35:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The ebuild shows some messages, in order to delete old plugins, one should invoke
 rm -r /usr/share/jedit
but that deletes the whole jedit installation.
The plugin jars are located in /usr/share/jedit/jars, but even that directory shouldn&apos;t be deleted blindly.



Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge app-editors/jedit-4.2-r2
2.read the comments


Actual Results:  
Comment recommends deletion of /usr/share/jedit and all its subdirectories

Expected Results:  
imho &quot;rm -rf&quot; should never be recommended at all, especially not when the directory is vital for a program</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caster@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-05-29 09:23:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>It&apos;s not post-merge message but postrm. But it&apos;s true you see it after remerge or upgrade too, because portage removes older version. Not sure if we can do anything about it. I&apos;ve added a message to make it more clear:

        elog &quot;Ignore this message if you are reinstalling or upgrading.&quot;</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>