<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>179327</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-05-21 15:42 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>sci-biology/t-coffee-4.96 stabilisation request</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-07-01 14:51:32 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>CANTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>ribosome@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>ribosome@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>ppc@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ribosome@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-05-21 15:42:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I would appreciate if all supporting arches (x86, ppc) would stabilise sci-biology/t-coffee. It has been in Portage for a while and works well. Sources for the latest current stable version are no longer available, so I want to remove that version ASAP.

Test instructions:

After compiling t-coffee, copy the &quot;sample_seq1.fasta&quot; file from
&quot;/usr/share/t-coffee/example&quot; to your home directory. This file contains the
amino acid sequences for four homologs of a protein in different species.

Run &quot;t_coffee sample_seq1.fasta&quot; to have t-coffee align the sequences,
calculate the alignment scores, construct a dendrogram, etc. Output files are
created in the working directory.

You can check the validity of the calculations by comparing the file &quot;sample_seq1.aln&quot; with the file I am attaching. (This output file is also available in the example directory, but it was created with an old version of the program, and the formatting is a bit different so you would have to compare the files manually. With the provided file, a diff should suffice.) The only difference between the files should be the CPU time used for the calculations.

Thanks in advance,</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ribosome@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-05-21 17:32:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=119904)
Reference sequence alignment

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-05-22 07:49:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nixnut@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-01 20:53:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;m seeing some differences between the output of t-coffee and your file:

diff sample_seq1.aln sample_seq1.aln.bugzie               
1c1
&lt; CLUSTAL FORMAT for T-COFFEE Version_4.96 [http://www.tcoffee.org], CPU=0.17 sec, SCORE=34, Nseq=4, Len=81 
---
&gt; CLUSTAL FORMAT for T-COFFEE Version_5.05 [http://www.tcoffee.org], CPU=0.08 sec, SCORE=33, Nseq=4, Len=81 
2a3,4
&gt; hmgl_trybr      kkdsnapkramtsfmffssdfrskhsdls-----ivemskaagaawkelgpeerkvyeem
&gt; hmgt_mouse      -----kpkrprsayniyvsesfqeakdds-----aqgklklvneawknlspeekqayiql
4d5
&lt; hmgl_trybr      kkdsnapkramtsfmffssdfrskhs-----dlsivemskaagaawkelgpeerkvyeem
6,7c7
&lt; hmgt_mouse      -----kpkrprsayniyvsesfqeakddsaqgkl-----klvneawknlspeekqayiql
&lt;                       ***. ::: .: ..  .. .             *  .  *: *    :  :   
---
&gt;                       ***. ::: .: ..  .. .  .          *  .  *: *    :  :   
9d8
&lt; hmgb_chite      aatakqnyiralqeyern-gg
11d9
&lt; hmgl_wheat      anklkgeynkaiaaynkgesa
12a11,12
&gt; hmgb_chite      aatakqnyiralqeyern-gg
&gt; hmgl_wheat      anklkgeynkaiaaynkgesa
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-01 21:00:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>beer &gt;&gt; coffee; sending back to maintainer... :P</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mabi@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-23 20:51:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>confirmed on an another G4. ribosome?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ribosome@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-29 15:38:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This should not happen, so I think it is best for version 4.96 not to be stabilised on PPC. These variations could be caused by the magnification of a small number-rounding difference. The differences are very small, though, and probably do not impact the alignment&apos;s validity, so I do not think it is necessary to mask t-coffee in the PPC profiles.

This leaves the problem of missing sources for the last (and only) stable PPC version. I suggest dropping the stable keyword and having t-coffee available only in the testing branch (for PPC).

What do you PPC folk think?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pylon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-01 14:51:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; This leaves the problem of missing sources for the last (and only) stable PPC
&gt; version. I suggest dropping the stable keyword and having t-coffee available
&gt; only in the testing branch (for PPC).
&gt; 
&gt; What do you PPC folk think?

That&apos;s okay for us.  Just drop the stable-version and keep the current version ~ppc.

So, let&apos;s close this bug.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>119904</attachid>
            <date>2007-05-21 17:32 0000</date>
            <desc>Reference sequence alignment</desc>
            <filename>sample_seq1.aln</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">Q0xVU1RBTCBGT1JNQVQgZm9yIFQtQ09GRkVFIFZlcnNpb25fNS4wNSBbaHR0cDovL3d3dy50Y29m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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>