177706 2007-05-08 19:37 0000 dev-lang/ocaml 3.09.3 doesn't install *opt binaries 2007-05-14 13:12:09 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 carlo@gentoo.org ml@gentoo.org coldwind@gentoo.org phreak@gentoo.org carlo@gentoo.org 2007-05-08 19:37:32 0000 /usr/bin/ocamlopt /usr/bin/ocamldep.opt etc. get not installed with this version. 3.09.2 is fine. Also I noticed that the ocaml build script still relies on the X11R6 legacy symlinks, instead using /usr/include/X11/ and /usr/$(get_libdir)/X11. aballier@gentoo.org 2007-05-10 12:40:01 0000 does -r1 or emerging it without "test" in your features solves the issue ? it seems that phreak tracked that one to "make bootstrap" deleting *opt binaries Christian, can you confirm this ? I don't understand how "make bootstrap" can be considered as a test anyway. make compare could be a test, but make bootstrap seems really weird to me. phreak@gentoo.org 2007-05-10 12:50:54 0000 (In reply to comment #1) > Christian, can you confirm this ? I don't understand how "make bootstrap" can > be considered as a test anyway. make compare could be a test, but make > bootstrap seems really weird to me. Ned (solar) tracked these, yes .. somehow the make bootstrap (that's what FEATURES=test does) removes the *opt files, and I haven't figured that out. carlo@gentoo.org 2007-05-11 17:38:30 0000 Yes, FEATURES=-test does it. Wonder why this ebuild got stable without disabling the test, when this is apparently a known issue... aballier@gentoo.org 2007-05-11 19:47:47 0000 11 May 2007; Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org> ocaml-3.09.3.ebuild, ocaml-3.09.3-r1.ebuild: Dont run make bootstrap for src_test, it deletes ocamlopt, upstream does not provide a clean test suite, if we want one we definitely should not use make bootstrap, closes bug #159237 and bug #177706 (In reply to comment #3) > Yes, FEATURES=-test does it. Wonder why this ebuild got stable without > disabling the test, when this is apparently a known issue... Well the issue is known since Ned tracked these, apparently not so long ago. And don't ask me why it has gone stable with such a major issue ;) aballier@gentoo.org 2007-05-14 13:12:09 0000 *** Bug 176909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***