<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>176533</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-04-30 08:11 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>x11-misc/qterm and sys-cluster/torque have the same file /usr/bin/qterm</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-01-10 16:24:58 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>QAcanfix</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>hwangping@gmail.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>hp-cluster@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>cjk@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>jsbronder@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>qa@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>rane@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>hwangping@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-30 08:11:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>You can install these two programs without Gentoo&apos;s warnings.However,it is not a serious problem cause hardly anybody will install them together as me.

Reproducible: Always</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-05 15:06:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Anyone to stick the blocker there?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-04 20:12:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>???</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jsbronder@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-12-06 00:32:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;ve added a blocker to torque-2.2.1-r2, but it looks like x11-misc/qterm only installs one binary.  Could we instead just rename the qterm binary in that package to qterminal or something similar?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jsbronder@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-12-06 00:44:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>...and at the advice of others, I reverted that change in hopes we can rename qterm.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-12-24 00:04:53 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>cjk:  what do you want to do with qterm here?  Is it worth keeping, do you want to rename the binary, or should we throw the blocker back in there?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>matsuu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-12-24 03:24:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sorry for delay
0.4.0-r1 in cvs. /usr/bin/qterm is renamed to /usr/bin/QTerm.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-12-30 19:55:21 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>matsuu:  Could you please put in an einfo in the new ebuild stating that the executable was renamed?  Just so we can reduce any possible confusion when users upgrade.

jsbronder: Could you put the blocker back (but only for &lt;x11-misc/qterm-0.4.0-r1) so that until everyone upgrades they are safe?

After those two things are addressed, we can close this and no one should have any more problems (besides not being able to have the two apps installed at the same time until the new qterm goes stable)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>zlin@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-01-01 14:29:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #7)
&gt; matsuu:  Could you please put in an einfo in the new ebuild stating that the
&gt; executable was renamed?  Just so we can reduce any possible confusion when
&gt; users upgrade.

s/einfo/elog/</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jsbronder@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-01-02 16:08:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Blocker added to torque in cvs.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-01-10 03:44:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>jsbronder: thanks.

cjk/matsuu: Any idea when we can expect an update?

Thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>matsuu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-01-10 15:41:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sorry for delay.
Added elog to x11-misc/qterm-0.4.0-r1.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-01-10 16:24:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Thanks everyone, marking this as fixed.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>