<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>175272</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-04-19 20:59 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>keyword request for app-editors/hteditor</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-09-11 10:01:12 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Unspecified</component>
          <version>2006.1</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://hte.sourceforge.net/</bug_file_loc>
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>dragonheart@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>arm@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>arm@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>gentoo-bugs.5.sepp@spamgourmet.com</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-19 20:59:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>As per URL (2.0beta news) hteditor is really cool and can do x86_64, ppc64 and arm assembly.

if you so desire please keyword as follows:
amd64 stable - app-editors/hteditor-2.0
~ppc64 unstable - app-editors/hteditor-2.0.3
~arm unstable - app-editors/hteditor-2.0.3

Test plan.

its an executable editor so treat it as such:
cp /bin/ls /tmp
/usr/bin/ht /tmp/ls
F6 - select program header
select program header offset
F4 (edit) - change offset to a slightly different value
F6 - select elf image
F4 (edit) - enter arbitary hex and show what a good assembler programmer you are.
F2 save
F10 exit

run /tmp/ls and admire your reworked masterpiece :-)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-20 08:15:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>
-- Authors comments that I endorce.
It would be cool to get this stable on x86, too. I don&apos;t really like
to maintain the 0.9.x and 2.0 releases in parallel and, as far as I
can tell, the 2.0 releases have no regressions compared to the 0.9.x
releases.
----

please x86 stabilise 2.0 so I can punt the 0.9* series.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-20 14:01:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-20 23:23:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>better include the ppc folks in a stable request so I can truely punt 0.9*.
ppc - stable request for hteditor-2.0.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-21 08:35:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>this isn&apos;t ppc64 friendly.. it segfaults:


(gdb) bt
#0  0x00000000101a4a2c in AnalyserHTOutput::endLine (this=0x16838) at out_ht.cc:133
#1  0x1b10000000000001 in ?? ()


I&apos;ve send upstream a message about this issue. let&apos;s wait and see if he can fix it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gentoo-bugs.5.sepp@spamgourmet.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-21 12:52:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fixed loading of ppc64 ELFs in 2.0.4. Thanks for finding this.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>armin76@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-21 19:21:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-21 22:22:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>added 2.0.4 for ppc64 pleasureing.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-22 07:21:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>2.0.4 still segfaults on ppc64. waiting for upstream.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-22 11:53:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #8)
&gt; 2.0.4 still segfaults on ppc64. waiting for upstream.

Sebastian released 2.0.5 which now runs perfect on ppc64. I&apos;ve done the version bump and added ~ppc64. will go stable in ~30 days.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-05-06 16:53:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; better include the ppc folks in a stable request so I can truely punt 0.9*.
&gt; ppc - stable request for hteditor-2.0.
&gt; 

ppc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-05-06 21:20:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>0.9 series removed from gentoo. long live the 2.0 series. Thanks Sebastian.

arm peoples feel free to keyword at your convenience. Its a cool program after all.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>armin76@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-09-11 10:01:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>arm will do if an user requests it</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>