<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>174505</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-04-13 18:43 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>mail-filter/sqlgrey init script needs eend $? added</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-06-14 20:00:20 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>candrews@integralblue.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>net-mail@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>lionel-dev@bouton.name</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>candrews@integralblue.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-13 18:43:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Baselayout-2 seems to be a little more picky about its init scripts.

sqlgrey will start, but rc-status will report it to be stopped, unless you change the &quot;eend&quot; lines to &quot;eend $?&quot;

After that change (only 2 lines) sqlgrey runs fine, and rc-status shows the correct status.

Thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>candrews@integralblue.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-07-16 19:41:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*poke*</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>lionel-dev@bouton.name</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-05 23:00:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Don&apos;t hesitate to CC: me. The gentoo init scripts is part of the original distribution. 
I&apos;ll add this to my CVS, but it&apos;s too bad that I learn this only moments after releasing versions in both the stable and development branch.

Or maybe should I remove the init script from the tar.bz2 and let Gentoo developpers handle this with the ebuild installing a separate init file?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-14 20:00:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; Or maybe should I remove the init script from the tar.bz2 and let Gentoo
&gt; developpers handle this with the ebuild installing a separate init file?

Having an init script maintained upstream ++ 

This is fixed in 1.7.6 in the meantime.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>