<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>174198</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-04-11 19:34 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>madwifi-ng-0.9.3 dropped &quot;injection&quot; USE flag</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-04-17 21:06:34 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>2006.1</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>chrb@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>steev@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>gengor@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chrb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-11 19:34:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I don&apos;t know why, since the existing patch madwifi-ng-r1886.patch for the previous version applies cleanly.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gengor@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-13 04:50:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=116119)
madwifi-ng-0.9.3-renable_injection.patch

Patch against net-wireless/madwifi-ng-0.9.3-r2.ebuild renables USE=&quot;injection&quot;.  Compiles cleanly, haven&apos;t tested its&apos; operation but I see no reason it shouldn&apos;t work.  

I didn&apos;t squawk when this was removed during the bump because I had thought I saw a changeset upstream that addressed this and didn&apos;t notice it wasn&apos;t because I don&apos;t typically use it.

Is there any reason this patch cannot be submitted upstream for the next release?  Or has it been and they won&apos;t accept it?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gengor@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-13 05:40:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Looks like the author needs to be found so he can sign off on the patch. =/

http://madwifi.org/ticket/553</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gengor@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-13 16:44:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Just wanted to drop a note so we don&apos;t duplicate efforts.  I&apos;ve got some movement going on getting this patched signed off by the originating authors so it can be accepted upstream for a future release.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>steev@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-16 19:38:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Re-added back in 0.9.3-r3 - thanks, I wanted to keep this as close to upstream as possible, but I have gotten enough requests that I&apos;ve added it back.  If you have any issues, please go back to -r2 before filing a bug :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakobdettner@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-17 21:06:34 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>injection works great with the new ebuild (tested with aireplay-ng -0 (deauth.)). thx for the reimplementation.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>116119</attachid>
            <date>2007-04-13 04:50 0000</date>
            <desc>madwifi-ng-0.9.3-renable_injection.patch</desc>
            <filename>madwifi-ng-0.9.3-renable_injection.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIG1hZHdpZmktbmctMC45LjMtcjIuZWJ1aWxkCTIwMDctMDQtMDkgMTM6MDY6MTAuMDAwMDAw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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>