<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>173399</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-04-04 21:14 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>net-misc/dhcpcd-2.0.5-r1 worked, net-misc/dhcpcd-3.0.16 doesn&apos;t</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-04-11 20:12:02 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>kim@runholt.dk</reporter>
          <assigned_to>uberlord@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kim@runholt.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-04 21:14:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>After upgrading dhcpcd from 2.0.5-r1 to 3.0.16, I can&apos;t get an IP address from my &quot;3COM OfficeConnect Wireless Cable/DSL Gateway&quot;.
I have tried both wireless and cabled connections.

Downgrading dhcpcd &quot;solves&quot; the problem.


Using 2.0.5:

# dhcpcd -N -R -d eth0
Info, MAC address = 00:14:22:fa:96:93
Debug, broadcasting DHCP_DISCOVER
Debug, dhcpIPaddrLeaseTime=43200 in DHCP server response.
Debug, dhcpT1value is missing in DHCP server response. Assuming 21600 sec
Debug, dhcpT2value is missing in DHCP server response. Assuming 37800 sec
Debug, DHCP_OFFER received from ÿ (192.168.1.1)
Debug, broadcasting DHCP_REQUEST for 192.168.1.248
Debug, dhcpIPaddrLeaseTime=43200 in DHCP server response.
Debug, dhcpT1value is missing in DHCP server response. Assuming 21600 sec
Debug, dhcpT2value is missing in DHCP server response. Assuming 37800 sec
Debug, DHCP_ACK received from ÿ (192.168.1.1)
Debug, broadcasting ARPOP_REQUEST for 192.168.1.248
Info, verified 192.168.1.248 address is not in use
Info, your IP address = 192.168.1.248
Debug, orig hostname = kru3


Using 3.0.16:

# dhcpcd -N -R -d eth0
Info, eth0: dhcpcd 3.0.16 starting
Info, eth0: hardware address = 00:14:22:fa:96:93
Info, eth0: broadcasting for a lease
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 1256379199
Debug, eth0: waiting on select for 20 seconds
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 1256379199
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 1256379199
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 1256379199
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 1256379199
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 1256379199
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 1256379199
Error, eth0: timed out
Info, eth0: exiting


# dhcpcd -N -R -d -l 43200 eth0
Info, eth0: dhcpcd 3.0.16 starting
Info, eth0: hardware address = 00:14:22:fa:96:93
Info, eth0: broadcasting for a lease
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 602271590
Debug, eth0: waiting on select for 20 seconds
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 602271590
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 602271590
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 602271590
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 602271590
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 602271590
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 602271590
Error, eth0: timed out
Info, eth0: exiting


Thanks.

-- Kim

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>uberlord@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-04 21:59:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Could you attach raw tcpdumps or wireshark traces for dhcpcd-2.0.5 and dhcpcd-3.0.16? If you would rather not attach them here, please email them to me.

Thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kim@runholt.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-04 22:08:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=115477)
Wireshark dump

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kim@runholt.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-04 22:08:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=115478)
Wireshark dump, shows failure

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>uberlord@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-04 22:32:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Well, both look fine. Could you try requesting an infinite least time?
dhcpcd -N -R -d -l -1 eth0</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kim@runholt.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-04 22:38:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Same result:

# dhcpcd -N -R -d -l -1 eth0
Info, eth0: dhcpcd 3.0.16 starting
Info, eth0: hardware address = 00:14:22:fa:96:93
Info, eth0: broadcasting for a lease
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 916755478
Debug, eth0: waiting on select for 20 seconds
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 916755478
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 916755478
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 916755478
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 916755478
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 916755478
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 916755478
Error, eth0: timed out
Info, eth0: exiting

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kim@runholt.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-05 07:56:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I experimented with different parameters and finally got it to work.
It seems that my cable router expects &quot;large requests&quot;:


FAILS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -i &quot;12345678901234567890123456789012345&quot; eth0

WORKS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -i &quot;123456789012345678901234567890123456&quot; eth0


FAILS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -h &quot;12345678901234567890123456&quot; eth0

WORKS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -h &quot;123456789012345678901234567&quot; eth0


FAILS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -u &quot;1234567890123456789&quot; eth0

WORKS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -u &quot;12345678901234567890&quot; eth0


FAILS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -I &quot;1234567890123456789012345678&quot; eth0

WORKS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -I &quot;12345678901234567890123456789&quot; eth0


FAILS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -I x -h x -u &quot;&quot; -i 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890 eth0

WORKS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -I x -h x -u &quot;&quot; -i 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901 eth0


FAILS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -I x -h x -u &quot;&quot; -l -1 -i 1234567890123456789012345678901234 eth0

WORKS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -I x -h x -u &quot;&quot; -l -1 -i 12345678901234567890123456789012345 eth0


FAILS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -I 12345678901 -h 12345678901 -u 1234567890 -i 1234567890 eth0

WORKS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -I 12345678901 -h 12345678901 -u 12345678901 -i 1234567890 eth0



WORKS: dhcpcd -N -R -d -I 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678 -h 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 -u 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 -i 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678 eth0



So just by specifying a long vendor ID, I got it to work:

# dhcpcd -N -R -d -i 123456789012345678901234567890123456 eth0
Info, eth0: dhcpcd 3.0.16 starting
Info, eth0: hardware address = 00:14:22:fa:96:93
Info, eth0: broadcasting for a lease
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_DISCOVER with xid 1771614337
Debug, eth0: waiting on select for 20 seconds
Debug, eth0: got a packet with xid 1771614337
Debug, eth0: no facility to parse DHCP code 52
Info, eth0: offered 192.168.1.248 from 192.168.1.1 `ÿ&apos;
Debug, eth0: sending DHCP_REQUEST with xid 1771614337
Debug, eth0: waiting on select for 19 seconds
Debug, eth0: got a packet with xid 1771614337
Debug, eth0: no facility to parse DHCP code 52
Error, eth0: given MTU 64 is too low, minium is 576
Info, eth0: leased 192.168.1.248 for 43200 seconds
Info, eth0: no renewal time supplied, assuming 21600 seconds
Info, eth0: no rebind time supplied, assuming 37800 seconds
Debug, eth0: setting MTU to 576
Info, eth0: adding IP address 192.168.1.248/24
Info, eth0: adding default route via 192.168.1.1 metric 0
Debug, eth0: no dns information to write
Debug, eth0: writing /var/lib/dhcpcd/dhcpcd-eth0.info
Debug, eth0: forking to background


I suspect that the cable router is to blame.

Thanks anyway.

Let me know if you need help trying something out on such a router.


-- Kim
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>uberlord@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-05 08:47:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ah, and another faulty MTU sender too! dhcpcd-3.0.17 will handle this a little better by simply ignoring values &lt;576 instead of setting 576. It will also have an option just to ignore it.

Do you want to open an upstream bug or ticket and reference it here or should we just close this?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kim@runholt.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-05 09:05:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #7)

If the router is to blame, then this bug should be closed.
My problem has been solved (worked-around), so I&apos;m happy.

It does, however, appear that the way dhcpcd-2.0.5 worked is more robust against faulty servers...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>uberlord@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-05 09:26:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #8)
&gt; (In reply to comment #7)
&gt; 
&gt; If the router is to blame, then this bug should be closed.
&gt; My problem has been solved (worked-around), so I&apos;m happy.
&gt; 
&gt; It does, however, appear that the way dhcpcd-2.0.5 worked is more robust
&gt; against faulty servers...

Well, so far just this one. dhcpcd-3.x works against 3 servers that 1.x and 2.x didn&apos;t, so it&apos;s a silly argument anyway.

Ah well. I&apos;m pretty sure it is a server issue as there is no minimum DHCP packet size as such.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>olger901@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-11 16:57:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I am having the exact same problem, dhcpcd-3.0.16 does not work, a dhcp request just times out, and when I revert back to dhcpcd-2.0.5 everything works fine.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>uberlord@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-11 17:05:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #10)
&gt; I am having the exact same problem, dhcpcd-3.0.16 does not work, a dhcp request
&gt; just times out, and when I revert back to dhcpcd-2.0.5 everything works fine.

And if you create a long packet as above it works? What router/AP are you using?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>olger901@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-11 17:49:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I am using a Conceptronic C100BRS4 router, and yes, it does seem to be solving the problem.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>olger901@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-11 17:54:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>BTW: My notebook is a Dell Inspiron 6400 with Broadcom 440 100Mbps LAN card and an Intel IPW3945 wireless card (both showing the same symptoms) in case you need to know.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>uberlord@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-11 17:56:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>OK I&apos;ll re-open this</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>olger901@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-11 18:16:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>BTW: I dont know if its going to be fixed, but if its not going to be fixed, I would like to suggest to add some sort of compatibility flag, which you can define in your /etc/conf.d/net For example adding the option dhcpcompat which will send a long request then.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kim@runholt.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-11 18:28:28 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I think an even simpler solution would be to change the default vendor ID.

For me, dhcpcd-2.0.5 uses the vendor ID string &quot;Linux 2.6.19-gentoo-r5 i686&quot;.
dhcpcd-3.0.16 uses the string &quot;dhcpcd 3.0.16&quot;.

While it was a coincidence, that version 2.0.5 worked for me, the long string was a blessing. If it hadn&apos;t worked, I would probably never had figured out how to get version 3.0.16 to work.

So if dhcpcd was changed to default to a long vendor ID string, some failing situations would be avoided while I don&apos;t think new failing situations would arise.

I think that would be a better solution than a new configuration parameter which does the same as &quot;-i &lt;long string&gt;&quot;
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>uberlord@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-11 18:35:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=115987)
Define a minimum packet length

This patch adds a define for a minimum packet length.

The default packet my PC sends is 276 bytes, but the BOOTP spec has a minimum size of 300 bytes. Of course, the this restriction is gone in DHCP spec, but I think this is the real error.

If the patch fails, try a larger number like say 500 and then decrease until we find the magic number</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kim@runholt.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-11 18:50:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #17)

I can confirm that the patch solves the problem for me.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>uberlord@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-11 20:12:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fixed in -r1, thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>115477</attachid>
            <date>2007-04-04 22:08 0000</date>
            <desc>Wireshark dump</desc>
            <filename>dhcpcd-2.0.5-works</filename>
            <type>application/octet-stream</type>
            <data encoding="base64">1MOyoQIABAAAAAAAAAAAAP//AAABAAAALwwURqbPBwBOAgAATgIAAP///////wAUIvqWkwgARQAC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</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>115478</attachid>
            <date>2007-04-04 22:08 0000</date>
            <desc>Wireshark dump, shows failure</desc>
            <filename>dhcpcd-3.0.16-fails</filename>
            <type>application/octet-stream</type>
            <data encoding="base64">1MOyoQIABAAAAAAAAAAAAP//AAABAAAAcRAURv7OBgBGAQAARgEAAP///////wAUIvqWkwgARRAB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</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>115987</attachid>
            <date>2007-04-11 18:35 0000</date>
            <desc>Define a minimum packet length</desc>
            <filename>dhcpcd-300.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">SW5kZXg6IGRoY3AuYwo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>