<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>170919</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-03-14 18:18 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>sci-libs/gsl-1.8 fails tests</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-06-23 12:04:14 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Library</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>180916</dependson>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>coldwind@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>sci@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>jer@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>coldwind@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-03-14 18:18:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>gsl-1.8 fails on eigen&apos;s test.

As said in gsl&apos;s mailing list [1], this error does not harm the correct behaviour of the library, however having working test suites is cool, right?

There&apos;s a tiny patch to solve it.

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-gsl@gnu.org/msg00192.html

Reproducible: Always</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>coldwind@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-03-14 18:19:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=113270)
gsl-1.8-tests.patch

Patch from upstream.
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-gsl@gnu.org/msg00192.html</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>coldwind@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-03-14 18:20:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=113272)
gsl-1.8-cleanup.patch

General clean-up for gsl-1.8.ebuild.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>markusle@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-03-15 13:00:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Thanks a lot for the note! It looks like this has been fixed in 1.9 already.
Hence, since it is a fairly minor issue I&apos;d personally rather just wait until
1.9 hits stable in one or two weeks down the road and leave 1.8 alone. 
I will definitely have a look at your cleanup suggestions and apply them to 
1.9 if applicable.

Thanks,
Markus

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-04 02:39:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; Hence, since it is a fairly minor issue I&apos;d personally rather just wait until
&gt; 1.9 hits stable in one or two weeks down the road and leave 1.8 alone. 

Maybe the time has now come?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>markusle@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-04 13:23:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Yeah, time flies ;) Somehow this one dropped from my
radar screen. Let me give 1.9 a spin again and if things
look fine I&apos;ll file the stabilization bug tonight.

Thanks for everybody&apos;s patience!

Best,
Markus</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>coldwind@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-23 11:56:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Now gsl-1.9 is stable in all arches that 1.8 is (and even more) so I guess this bug is fixed ;-)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>markusle@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-06-23 12:04:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Absolutely! Thanks for pointing this out.

Best,
Markus</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>113270</attachid>
            <date>2007-03-14 18:19 0000</date>
            <desc>gsl-1.8-tests.patch</desc>
            <filename>gsl-1.8-tests.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">ZGlmZiAtdSAtcjEuMjMgdGVzdC5jCi0tLSBlaWdlbi90ZXN0LmMgICAgICAyMiBBdWcgMjAwNSAx
Mzo1MDo0NyAtMDAwMCAgICAgIDEuMjMKKysrIGVpZ2VuL3Rlc3QuYyAgICAgIDE4IEFwciAyMDA2
IDE5OjQyOjA3IC0wMDAwCkBAIC0xNDUsNyArMTQ1LDcgQEAKICAgICB7CiAgICAgICBkb3VibGUg
ZWkgPSBnc2xfdmVjdG9yX2dldCAoZXZhbCwgaSk7CiAgICAgICBkb3VibGUgZTJpID0gZ3NsX3Zl
Y3Rvcl9nZXQgKGV2YWwyLCBpKTsKLSAgICAgIGdzbF90ZXN0X3JlbChlaSwgZTJpLCAxMCpHU0xf
REJMX0VQU0lMT04sIAorICAgICAgZ3NsX3Rlc3RfcmVsKGVpLCBlMmksIDEwKk4qR1NMX0RCTF9F
UFNJTE9OLCAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAiJXMsIGRpcmVjdCBlaWdlbnZhbHVlKCVkKSwg
JXMiLAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGRlc2MsIGksIGRlc2MyKTsKICAgICB9Cg==
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>113272</attachid>
            <date>2007-03-14 18:20 0000</date>
            <desc>gsl-1.8-cleanup.patch</desc>
            <filename>gsl-1.8-cleanup.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIC91c3IvcG9ydGFnZS9zY2ktbGlicy9nc2wvZ3NsLTEuOC5lYnVpbGQJMjAwNy0wMy0wNiAx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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>