<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>166803</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-02-14 10:13 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-1.2-r1 contains broken libsmbclient.so</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-02-26 10:20:08 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>165270</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>blubb@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>amd64@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>beandog@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>blubb@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>chris@realcomputerguy.com</cc>
    
    <cc>daniel.mohr@unibw-muenchen.de</cc>
    
    <cc>gentoobugs@wonderclown.com</cc>
    
    <cc>pacho@condmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es</cc>
    
    <cc>phajdan.jr@gmail.com</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-14 10:13:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>after upgrading emul-linux-x86-baselibs to 10.0-r1, revdep-rebuild says:

  broken /usr/lib32/libsmbclient.so (requires  liblber.so.2 libldap.so.2)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chris@realcomputerguy.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-14 21:07:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>confirmed</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>simius@mail.tvnet.hu</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-16 14:56:21 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I witnessed this too.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>birder@ozemail.com.au</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-16 18:58:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Is this an emul-linux-x86-medialibs bug, or an emul-linux-x86-baselibs bug?

The liblber.so.2 and libldap.so.2 symlinks aren&apos;t created by baselibs-10.0-r1; it has:

/usr/lib32/liblber.so -&gt; liblber-2.3.so.0.2.18
/usr/lib32/liblber-2.3.so.0 -&gt; liblber-2.3.so.0.2.18
/usr/lib32/libldap.so -&gt; libldap-2.3.so.0.2.18
/usr/lib32/libldap-2.3.so.0 -&gt; libldap-2.3.so.0.2.18

If the .so.2 links should be there, it&apos;s a baselibs bug; if not, it&apos;s an medialibs bug.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-16 19:06:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>&gt; Is this an emul-linux-x86-medialibs bug, or an emul-linux-x86-baselibs bug?

medialibs bug. samba shouldn&apos;t even be in there. I have a fixed version in the queue, but that one requires mplayer-bin to be rebuilt too, which I&apos;m currently working on.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-18 21:38:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>10.0 fixes this</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chris@realcomputerguy.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-23 17:45:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
&gt; 10.0 fixes this
&gt; 

It may fix it but it is masked plus it breaks mplayer-bin due to missing libizo.so.1.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-25 12:18:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 168306 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>daniel.mohr@unibw-muenchen.de</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-25 16:59:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
&gt; 10.0 fixes this
&gt; 

app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-10.1 or
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-10.1-r1 doesn&apos;t fix it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-26 09:44:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 168306 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-26 09:45:53 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>&gt; app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-10.1 or
&gt; app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-10.1-r1 doesn&apos;t fix it.

emul-linux-x86-*medialibs*-10.0 does, though.

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>