165948 2007-02-08 17:35 0000 sci-electronics/geda-suite wrong gnucap dependency 2007-02-08 19:54:28 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Applications 2006.1 x86 Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 165283 1 ke6fis@arrl.net sci-electronics@gentoo.org fauli@gentoo.org ke6fis@arrl.net 2007-02-08 17:35:28 0000 After an emerge --sync I encountered the following: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sci-electronics/gnucap-20050808" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sci-electronics/gnucap-20060708 (masked by: missing keyword) - sci-electronics/gnucap-20060830 (masked by: missing keyword) For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. (dependency required by "sci-electronics/geda-suite-20050820" [ebuild]) The geda-suite metapackage (for ~x86) requires a version of gnucap which is missing the x86 or ~x86 keyword altogether. The ~x86 keyword needs to be restored in the required gnucap ebuild. If this is not possible because gnucap no longer supports x86 then either gnucap should be removed as a geda-suite dependency or the geda-suite ebuild should no longer list ~x86 as a valid keyword. In either case it would be nice if a note stating x86 was no longer supported could be added to the ChangeLog. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.emerge --sync 2.emerge -uDpv world 3.read the message jakub@gentoo.org 2007-02-08 17:46:07 0000 (In reply to comment #0) > If this is not possible because gnucap no longer supports x86 then either > gnucap should be removed as a geda-suite dependency or the geda-suite ebuild > should no longer list ~x86 as a valid keyword. In either case it would be nice > if a note stating x86 was no longer supported could be added to the ChangeLog. Eh, the dependency just needs to be changed to >=0.35 fauli@gentoo.org 2007-02-08 18:54:38 0000 Bob Johnson, could you please locally test if geda-suite works fine with gnucap 0.35? fauli@gentoo.org 2007-02-08 19:54:28 0000 Ok, adjusted dependency.