<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>164659</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-01-31 06:22 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Add 2.6.19 kernel support to net-wireless/at76c503a</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-05-09 19:22:14 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>156669</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>spock255@hotmail.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>mobile@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>spock255@hotmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-31 06:22:45 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The net-wireless/at76c503a module requires linux/config.h from the kernel source that was depreciated and removed.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge at76c503a</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>steev@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-10 04:40:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=109700)
Version check

Try this patch, I am not sure if its affected by the work queue changes with 2.6.20 - and I don&apos;t have the hardware handy, but I figured I would write the version check patch at least - this patch should apply cleanly to beta1, and also work with kernels 2.6.19 and below (at least)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>spock255@hotmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-15 16:59:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I did something similar by hand to make it compile for me, but I am trying out your patch and cant get it to apply...

I tried to use this in the ebuild:

src_unpack() {
        epatch ${FILESDIR}/${P}-version-check.patch
}

I&apos;m sure it is my fault but it is complaining that it can&apos;t find the files to patch.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>windowsucks2000@netscape.net</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-22 22:17:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I also tried to have the ebuild apply the patch and failed. The ebuild seems to completely bypass unpack(), but I don&apos;t know how. I wonder if it has anything to do with the linux-mod eclass. But I looked at the eclass code and didn&apos;t find anything that seems to override the default behavior of unpack(). I was going to submit the bug upstream, since that&apos;s where I think it belongs, but ... I don&apos;t have an account at berlios. Yeah, I know. Laziness kicked in.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>spock255@hotmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-03-16 16:15:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ping

The patch easly works when i do it by hand, if someone could add it to the tree it would be nice :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>windowsucks2000@netscape.net</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-01 16:37:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;ve added a bug report for a CVS ebuild (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173034) It compiles and runs with my 2.6.20 kernel. The only thing broken now is Xorg :(

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-05-09 19:22:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>thank you patch and cvs ebuild in portage</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>109700</attachid>
            <date>2007-02-10 04:40 0000</date>
            <desc>Version check</desc>
            <filename>at76c503a-0.14-kernel_version_check.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">ZGlmZiAtcnVOIGF0NzZfdXNiLTAuMTRiZXRhMS5vcmlnL2F0NzZjNTAzLmMgYXQ3Nl91c2ItMC4x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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>