<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>16243</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2003-02-23 15:46 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>&quot;emerge world -u&quot; installs OLDER versions of stuff already installed</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2003-12-27 00:20:14 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Portage Development</product>
          <component>Unclassified (old)</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>INVALID</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>djandruczyk@yahoo.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>bug-wranglers@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>djandruczyk@yahoo.com</who>
            <bug_when>2003-02-23 15:46:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>running emerge rsync on my systems recently warns me that a new versionf of 
portage is available.  Checking via emerge world -up&quot; says that portage version 
2.0.47-r2 is installed, but 2.0.46-r12 is scheduled to be installed if I run &quot;emerge world 
-u&quot;  I&apos;ve tried multiple rsync&apos;s to make sure I didn&apos;t sync from an out-of date mirror. Still 
get the issue.  decided NOT to re-emerge an older version of portage for fear that it 
might cause more issues.   
 
does portageand your rsync system use some sort of check-pointing to determine how 
far out ofa data a mirror is with the central repository (like cvs) ? Waht happens when 
someone rsync&apos;s to a mirro that is behind the times? (slow links or server misconfig) 
 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge rsync 
2.emerge world -up 
 
Actual Results:  
&quot;emerge&quot; displays: 
 [ebuild    UD] sys-apps/portage-2.0.46-r12 [2.0.47-r2]    
 
2.0.47-r2 is already installed, why would I want to downgrade? 
 

Expected Results:  
not have chosen to downgrade portage to an older release. 
 

Portage 2.0.47-r2 (default-1.0, gcc-2.95.3, glibc-2.2.5-r2,2.2.5-r7) 
================================================================= 
System uname: 2.4.19-xfs-r2a i686 AMD Athlon(tm) MP 
GENTOO_MIRRORS=&quot;http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu/ http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Lin 
ux/distributions/gentoo&quot; 
CONFIG_PROTECT=&quot;/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/share/config /usr/kde/2/share/confi 
g /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb:/usr/kde/3.1/share/config:/usr/ 
kde/3/share/config:/usr/share/config&quot; 
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK=&quot;/etc/gconf /etc/env.d&quot; 
PORTDIR=&quot;/usr/portage&quot; 
DISTDIR=&quot;/usr/portage/distfiles&quot; 
PKGDIR=&quot;/usr/portage/packages&quot; 
PORTAGE_TMPDIR=&quot;/var/tmp&quot; 
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=&quot;&quot; 
USE=&quot;x86 oss 3dnow apm avi crypt cups encode jpeg libg++ mikmod mmx mpeg 
ncurses 
 pdflib qtmt quicktime spell xml2 xmms xv aalib arts berkdb bonobo cdr directfb  
esd gdbm ggi gif gnome-libs gpm gtkhtml guile imlib java libwww motif mozilla na 
s nls oggvorbis pam perl png python qt readline ruby scanner sdl slang ssl svga  
tcltk tcpd tetex tiff X gtk gnome alsa kde opengl -ldap truetype&quot; 
COMPILER=&quot;&quot; 
CHOST=&quot;i686-pc-linux-gnu&quot; 
CFLAGS=&quot;-O2 -mcpu=i686 -pipe&quot; 
CXXFLAGS=&quot;&quot; 
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=&quot;x86&quot; 
MAKEOPTS=&quot;-j3&quot; 
AUTOCLEAN=&quot;yes&quot; 
SYNC=&quot;rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage&quot; 
FEATURES=&quot;sandbox ccache&quot;</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mholzer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2003-02-23 15:57:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>there were too much problem with .47
so we decided to switch back

if you don&apos;t have any problems, you don&apos;t need to downgrade</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>