<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>161871</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-01-13 10:23 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-office/openoffice-2.1.0 forces jdk-1.4</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-01-13 23:44:13 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>alonbl@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>openoffice@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>robert.kruus@utoronto.ca</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>alonbl@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-13 10:23:59 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Hi!

Please modify dependency:
-       java? ( || ( =virtual/jdk-1.4* !amd64? ( =virtual/jdk-1.5* ) )
+       java? ( || ( !amd64? ( =virtual/jdk-1.5* ) =virtual/jdk-1.4* )

It first will try to use the amd64 conditional and then continue to lower version.

Thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>suka@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-13 10:54:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Interestingly this worked without problems in older versions...

Anyway: Thanks for pointing this out, I&apos;ve fixed this now (also in 2.0.4)
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-13 23:44:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 161961 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>