<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>160669</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-01-07 13:00 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>stabilize dev-java/jdom-1.0-r2</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-01-30 02:27:00 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>fordfrog@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>java@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fordfrog@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-07 13:00:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>dev-java/jdom is currently slotted on ${PV} which is not good and it even doesn&apos;t seem to be correct. I just compared jdom-1.0_beta9-r1 and jdom-1.0 and according to apicheck they are 100% compatible so there is no need to have two slots: 1.0_beta9 and jdom-1.0.

Few packages are depending on jdom so it would be good to move those that depend on slot 1.0_beta9 to slot jdom-1.0 and get rid of the beta9 and beta10 jdom as 1.0 is already stable.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caster@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-07 13:34:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I agree, I don&apos;t see why this slot madness.
Note that 1.0 isn&apos;t stable ppc64, not even ~ppc64 although at least jaxen (depending on jdom) already is... so we need to get this fixed first. </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>betelgeuse@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-07 13:53:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; I agree, I don&apos;t see why this slot madness.
&gt; Note that 1.0 isn&apos;t stable ppc64, not even ~ppc64 although at least jaxen
&gt; (depending on jdom) already is... so we need to get this fixed first. 
&gt; 

We could use this opportunity to get gen 2 version 1.0-r2 stable. I just added r2:
*jdom-1.0-r2 (07 Jan 2007)

  07 Jan 2007; Petteri Räty &lt;betelgeuse@gentoo.org&gt; +jdom-1.0-r2.ebuild:
  Changed javadocs to install to standard location and add missing
  app-arch/zip DEPEND for the source use flag.

If you are not confortable with this, go with 1.0-r1, but then we should add the missing dep there. It will likely take a while before ppc64 gets 1.0* stable as it is not even ~arch there now.

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-09 10:38:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 jdominates!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-11 13:59:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>jdom-1.0-r2 stable on ppc64.

I doubt that anybody would have tested this any further in a four weeks period it&apos;s ~ppc64.

Note that I&apos;ve stabilized commons-beanutils-1.6.1-r3, commons-beanutils-1.7.0-r2 and commons-lang-2.0-r2, too, because previous stable versions didn&apos;t compile and the only change according to the changelog was gen-2 compatibility.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>beandog@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-15 12:36:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gentoo@ndansmith.net</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-30 02:14:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>josejx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-30 02:27:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Closing since we&apos;re the last arch.  Thanks to ndansmith for testing.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>