<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>159951</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-01-04 05:14 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-office/openoffice &lt; 2.1 integer overflow (CVE-2006-5870)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-01-12 22:06:52 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Security</product>
          <component>Vulnerabilities</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70042</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>A2 [glsa] DerCorny</status_whiteboard>
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>147542</dependson>
    
    <dependson>159859</dependson>
    
    <dependson>159862</dependson>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>aetius@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>security@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>keith@email.arizona.edu</cc>
    
    <cc>openoffice@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>suka@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aetius@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-04 05:14:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=releases&amp;msgNo=10454

http://secunia.com/advisories/23612/

Your basic file format handling issue, this time WMF/EMF files.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aetius@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-04 05:32:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>setting status and cc&apos;ing herd.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>suka@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-04 05:40:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Situation is like this:

openoffice-bin 2.0.4 is vulnerable

openoffice-2.0.4 (source based build) is NOT. The fix for this problem has already been in ooo-build before the initial 2.0.4-release (it&apos;s in http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/ooo-build/branches/ooo-build-2-0-4/patches/src680/cws-cmcfixes28.diff?rev=7820&amp;view=markup)

So what I propose is to stabilize openoffice-bin 2.1.0. and openoffice 2.0.4, afterwards delete the vulnerable versions. There are already bugs about that, which I&apos;ll update and add as a dependency here.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aetius@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-04 06:12:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Thanks suka.

arches please test and mark stable:

app-office/openoffice-bin-2.1.0
app-office/openoffice-2.0.4

target keywords for -bin are: KEYWORDS=&quot;amd64 x86&quot;
target keywords for regular are: KEYWORDS=&quot;~amd64 ppc sparc x86&quot;</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-04 07:56:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 159859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-04 08:11:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>-bin 2.1.0 x86 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>falco@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-04 11:16:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 160029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-05 00:14:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 is done with both versions</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mcummings@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-07 05:12:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>-bin 2.1.0 amd64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mcummings@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-07 05:34:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Given: 

(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; target keywords for -bin are: KEYWORDS=&quot;amd64 x86&quot;
&gt; target keywords for regular are: KEYWORDS=&quot;~amd64 ppc sparc x86&quot;

amd64 should be all set (stable on one, arch testing on the other). 
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pylon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-07 06:58:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I still have problems with OOo on ppc.  With java-use-flag set it fails during the compile phase and without it fails on the pyUNO bug #147542...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>suka@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-07 09:01:29 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #10)
&gt; I still have problems with OOo on ppc.  With java-use-flag set it fails during
&gt; the compile phase and without it fails on the pyUNO bug #147542...
&gt; 

I&apos;ve commented in the pyuno-bug</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-08 18:42:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-09 18:22:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Works for &gt;3 people on ppc, -&gt; stable!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dercorny@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-09 18:47:45 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>thanks, this is ready for glsa</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>suka@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-09 20:05:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;ve removed openoffice-2.0.3 from the tree now</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>falco@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-12 22:06:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>GLSA 200701-07</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>