<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>158886</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-12-22 23:10 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Stabilize app-admin/conky-1.4.5 request</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-02-07 19:18:43 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>brenden@rty.ca</reporter>
          <assigned_to>dragonheart@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>kovacsp3@comcast.net</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>brenden@rty.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2006-12-22 23:10:21 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>It would be nice to get conky-1.4.5 marked as stable across alpha, amd64, x86, ppc, ppc64, and sparc as this is probably the most stable release yet.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-12-22 23:58:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>in keeping with the 30 days before stable policy I&apos;ll forward this to the arch teams mid Jan. Feel free to remind me as this date comes about.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gliverman@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-12 18:10:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Just wanted to let you know that 1.4.5 seems to actually run better than the &quot;stable&quot; one on my amd64 system.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-20 06:41:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>As per upstream recommentdaion 1.4.5 is stablier than anything previous.

Test Plan:

emerge conky-1.4.5
zcat /usr/share/doc/conky-1.4.5/conkyrc.sample.gz&gt;~/.conkyrc (if you don&apos;t have a conky setup already)
conky

should see conky resourse monitoring on desktop</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-20 08:40:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I cannot mark stable on ppc64, because media-sound/bmpx is a dependency, which is not stable at the moment (neither keyworded as stable nor stable while running).

so.. mask bmpx useflag? is bmpx stable on other arches? mask in in ppc64 only or globaly?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-21 00:06:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 (In reply to comment #4)
&gt; I cannot mark stable on ppc64, because media-sound/bmpx is a dependency, which
&gt; is not stable at the moment (neither keyworded as stable nor stable while
&gt; running).

&gt; so.. mask bmpx useflag? is bmpx stable on other arches? mask in in ppc64 only
&gt; or globaly?

 Same problems here on x86 with bmpx...keyworded but I haven&apos;t tested it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ticho@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-21 12:51:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Due to bug #162405, bmpx is not going to enter stable x86 anytime soon, so I&apos;d mask the conky&apos;s useflag and stabilize like that.

Of course, someone must remember to unmask the flag once it&apos;s appropriate. :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-22 07:31:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>bmpx USE flag now masked in base profile (unmask it in your arch&apos;s profile at will) and marked stable on x86</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-22 16:10:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-22 17:45:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>josejx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-31 05:12:29 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Marked ppc stable.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-07 19:18:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>