158438 2006-12-18 02:22 0000 dev-libs/elfutils-0.127 fails test on alpha/sparc, previous version didn't 2008-04-20 08:13:14 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds 2006.1 All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 trivial --- 1 stefaan@gentoo.org toolchain@gentoo.org alpha@gentoo.org hppa@gentoo.org sparc@gentoo.org stefaan@gentoo.org 2006-12-18 02:22:16 0000 both on gcc 3.4.6 and gcc 4.1.1. Seems like alpha is a not so well-known architecture anymore for this package... or at least its tests. I don't known enough about this to solve it by myself. Maybe this is not so serious, feel free to mark invalid PASS: run-strip-test6.sh PASS: run-ecp-test.sh PASS: run-ecp-test2.sh PASS: run-elflint-test.sh unknown machine type 36902 section [ 3] '.hash': entry size does not match Elf32_Word section [ 3] '.hash': chain array not large enough section [ 3] '.hash': hash bucket reference 0 out of bounds section [23] '.sdata' contains unknown flag(s) 0x10000000 section [24] '.sbss' contains unknown flag(s) 0x10000000 FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh PASS: run-ranlib-test.sh ranlib: elf32_getshdr.c:96: elf64_getshdr: Assertion `ehdr->e_ident[5] != 1 || (! 0 && (ehdr->e_shoff & (__alignof__ (Elf64_Shdr) - 1)) != 0)' failed. ./test-subr.sh: line 65: 29370 Aborted LD_LIBRARY_PATH="${built_library_path}${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:}$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" "$@" FAIL: run-ranlib-test2.sh ranlib: elf32_getshdr.c:96: elf64_getshdr: Assertion `ehdr->e_ident[5] != 1 || (! 0 && (ehdr->e_shoff & (__alignof__ (Elf64_Shdr) - 1)) != 0)' failed. ./test-subr.sh: line 65: 29379 Aborted LD_LIBRARY_PATH="${built_library_path}${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:}$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" "$@" FAIL: run-ranlib-test3.sh PASS: run-ranlib-test4.sh PASS: run-addrscopes.sh PASS: run-strings-test.sh PASS: run-funcscopes.sh PASS: run-find-prologues.sh PASS: run-allregs.sh PASS: msg_tst PASS: asm-tst1 PASS: asm-tst2 PASS: asm-tst3 PASS: asm-tst4 PASS: asm-tst5 PASS: asm-tst6 PASS: asm-tst7 PASS: asm-tst8 PASS: asm-tst9 ===================================================== 3 of 47 tests failed Please report to http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ ===================================================== make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/extra/var/tmp/portage/elfutils-0.118/work/elfutils-0.118/tests' make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/extra/var/tmp/portage/elfutils-0.118/work/elfutils-0.118/tests' make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 !!! ERROR: dev-libs/elfutils-0.118 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1546: Called dyn_test ebuild.sh, line 986: Called src_test elfutils-0.118.ebuild, line 57: Called die !!! test failed !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. kloeri@gentoo.org 2007-03-10 20:55:07 0000 0.125 fails 4 tests on Alpha. PASS: run-ecp-test.sh PASS: run-ecp-test2.sh PASS: run-elflint-test.sh section [22] '.sdata' contains unknown flag(s) 0x10000000 section [23] '.sbss' contains unknown flag(s) 0x10000000 *** failure in ../src/addr2line FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh PASS: run-ranlib-test.sh testfile19 testfile19.index differ: char 57, line 2 FAIL: run-ranlib-test2.sh testfile20 testfile20.index differ: char 9, line 2 FAIL: run-ranlib-test3.sh PASS: run-ranlib-test4.sh PASS: run-addrscopes.sh PASS: run-strings-test.sh PASS: run-funcscopes.sh PASS: run-find-prologues.sh PASS: run-allregs.sh PASS: run-readelf-test1.sh ./allregs: dwfl_module_register_names: no backend registers known FAIL: run-native-test.sh PASS: run-bug1-test.sh PASS: msg_tst PASS: asm-tst1 armin76@gentoo.org 2007-06-28 13:48:47 0000 @toolchain: any ideas? 0.127 still fails the same tests kloeri posted armin76@gentoo.org 2007-07-16 13:26:21 0000 There are more arches affected vapier: Debian uses 0.128 and uses it's own patchset which contains specific archs fixes. Using their patches no tests fail. jer@gentoo.org 2007-07-16 21:47:27 0000 2 tests have been failing for ages on hppa; run-elflint-self.sh and run-native-test.sh: unsupported OS ABI e_ident[7] == 'Linux' invalid machine flags: 0x210 section [ 8] '.rela.dyn': relocation 0: invalid type section [ 8] '.rela.dyn': relocation 1: invalid type section [ 8] '.rela.dyn': relocation 2: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 0: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 1: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 2: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 3: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 4: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 5: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 6: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 7: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 8: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 9: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 10: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 11: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 12: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 13: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 14: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 15: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 16: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 17: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 18: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 19: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 20: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 21: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 22: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 23: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 24: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 25: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 26: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 27: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 28: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 29: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 30: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 31: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 32: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 33: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.plt': relocation 34: invalid type section [21] '.plt': size not multiple of entry size section [36] '.symtab': symbol 70: unknown type *** failure in ../src/addr2line FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh [...] ./allregs: dwfl_module_register_names: no backend registers known FAIL: run-native-test.sh No regression there, just something that was never well polished for HPPA in the first place. :) vapier@gentoo.org 2008-04-20 08:13:14 0000 should be fixed with elfutils-0.131-r2