157917 2006-12-12 06:47 0000 sys-apps/baselayout - fix a few typos 2006-12-12 09:17:07 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux baselayout unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 trivial --- 1 jadamcze@utas.edu.au uberlord@gentoo.org base-system@gentoo.org jadamcze@utas.edu.au 2006-12-12 06:47:14 0000 Apply to all baselayout 1.11* and 1.12* ebuilds. --- baselayout-1.12.7.ebuild.orig 2006-12-13 01:31:11.000000000 +1100 +++ baselayout-1.12.7.ebuild 2006-12-13 01:31:41.000000000 +1100 @@ -446 +446 @@ - # save a couple minutes time by refraining from building the unnecessary + # save a couple of minutes time by refraining from building the unnecessary @@ -455 +455 @@ - einfo "Making device node tarball (this could take a couple minutes)" + einfo "Making device node tarball (this could take a couple of minutes)" jadamcze@utas.edu.au 2006-12-12 06:59:01 0000 Something else in the same ebuild(s) : You are advised to review the new configuration variables as found in //etc/conf.d/net.example as there is no guarantee that they will work in future versions. There's no guarantee that the new configuration variables will work in the future? So why add them? And then why review them? uberlord@gentoo.org 2006-12-12 09:16:01 0000 (In reply to comment #0) > + einfo "Making device node tarball (this could take a couple of > minutes)" > Fixed uberlord@gentoo.org 2006-12-12 09:17:07 0000 (In reply to comment #1) > Something else in the same ebuild(s) : > > You are advised to review the new configuration variables as > found in //etc/conf.d/net.example as there is no > guarantee that they will work in future versions. > > > There's no guarantee that the new configuration variables will work in the > future? So why add them? And then why review them? > When you take the line above that into account it makes sense IE, the variables you are currently using in /etc/conf.d/net are deprecated and not guaranteed to work in future versions. IE, the variables you have added