157265 2006-12-05 14:52 0000 evo/evolution use flags cleanup 2007-08-30 16:11:56 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 134491 1 cl81@gmx.net gnome-office@gentoo.org jakub@gentoo.org metalgod@gentoo.org mobile-phone@gentoo.org net-mail@gentoo.org pda@gentoo.org slarti@gentoo.org cl81@gmx.net 2006-12-05 14:52:20 0000 There is a global use-flag "evo" for evolution support. mail-notification instead uses its own local use-flag "evolution" instead. Is that intended behaviour? Shouldn't it switch to the global use flag instead? jakub@gentoo.org 2006-12-05 22:54:18 0000 $ euse -i evo global use flags (searching: evo) ************************************************************ [- ] evo - Adds support for evolution in gnumeric and multisync # pquery --raw --no-version --has-use=evo app-misc/beagle app-mobilephone/bitpim app-pda/multisync app-pda/multisync-gui net-mail/lbdb Doesn't exactly match the description, huh? $ euse -i evolution local use flags (searching: evolution) ************************************************************ [- ] evolution (mail-client/mail-notification): Provide an Evolution plugin # pquery --raw --no-version --has-use=evolution mail-client/mail-notification How about fixing the evo flag description and killing evolution? mrness@gentoo.org 2006-12-06 01:37:27 0000 (In reply to comment #1) > How about fixing the evo flag description and killing evolution? fine by me. metalgod@gentoo.org 2006-12-06 06:16:16 0000 sounds good for me too regarding to app-misc/beagle. eva@gentoo.org 2007-06-24 09:41:28 0000 ping, anybody taking the move ? r3pek@gentoo.org 2007-07-25 22:08:59 0000 what would be the description? "Adds support to evolution" ??? eva@gentoo.org 2007-07-25 22:35:13 0000 sounds good to me. pva@gentoo.org 2007-08-30 16:11:56 0000 Finally fixed in CVS. I've fixed evo USE flag description on "Adds support for evolution". If you disagree, change in CVS, please ;)