<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>155544</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-11-17 23:10 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>x11-libs/cairo-1.2.4 stablization request</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-02-25 17:24:56 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>2006.1</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>149475</dependson>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>cardoe@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>mips@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>gentopia@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>python@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-17 23:10:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Just a request to get 1.2.4 stable. The only outstanding bugs is a request for a patch that wasn&apos;t accepted upstream into the 1.2.x branch (I thought it was) but appears to have been entirely redone and worked into the 1.3.x branch (which will become 1.4.x)

This blocks gtk+ 2.10.x going stable. People should get better performance and better fonts from 1.2.4 and higher then the current stable.

I&apos;d like to have 1.2.4 stable for a bit and get a quick-ish 1.2.6 stablization since it&apos;s probably the last version until 1.4.0</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tester@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-17 23:30:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 stable. and glitz 0.5.6 too</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-17 23:34:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I forgot to note that media-libs/glitz-0.5.6 needs to be stabled as well.

@python herd: you might want to take a look at pycairo.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>angelos@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 01:47:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>You definitely want to, since we&apos;re now running into Bug 149475</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nixnut@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 01:58:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on ppc</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>maekke@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 12:27:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>media-libs/glitz-0.5.6
1. emerges on x86
2. passes collision test

x11-libs/cairo-1.2.4  USE=&quot;X png svg -directfb -doc -glitz -pdf&quot;
1. emerges on x86
2. passes collision test
3. x11-libs/libsvg-cairo-0.1.6 and x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 emerge fine with this version. revdep-rebuild doesn&apos;t show anything broken. 

there is a problem with this package: dev-python/pycairo
it depends on &quot;=x11-libs/cairo-1.0*&quot; which will cause a downgrade, which should be fixed first. (maybe there are more packages, I just spottet this one)

Portage 2.1.1-r2 (default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.4-r4, 2.6.18.1 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.18.1 i686 Genuine Intel(R) CPU           T2300  @ 1.66GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.6
Last Sync: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:00:01 +0000
ccache version 2.3 [disabled]
app-admin/eselect-compiler: [Not Present]
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.30
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5-r3, 2.4.3-r4
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     2.3
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.60
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.13-r4
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.17-r1
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=&quot;x86&quot;
AUTOCLEAN=&quot;yes&quot;
CBUILD=&quot;i686-pc-linux-gnu&quot;
CFLAGS=&quot;-O2 -march=prescott -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer&quot;
CHOST=&quot;i686-pc-linux-gnu&quot;
CONFIG_PROTECT=&quot;/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /var/qmail/alias /var/qmail/control&quot;
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK=&quot;/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf /etc/java-config/vms/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/web2c&quot;
CXXFLAGS=&quot;-O2 -march=prescott -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer&quot;
DISTDIR=&quot;/usr/portage/distfiles&quot;
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=&quot;--nospinner&quot;
FEATURES=&quot;autoconfig collision-protect distlocks metadata-transfer parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict test userfetch userpriv usersandbox&quot;
GENTOO_MIRRORS=&quot;http://mirror.switch.ch/mirror/gentoo/ http://gentoo.inode.at/&quot;
LINGUAS=&quot;en de en_GB de_CH&quot;
MAKEOPTS=&quot;-j3&quot;
PKGDIR=&quot;/usr/portage/packages&quot;
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS=&quot;--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180 --exclude=&apos;/distfiles&apos; --exclude=&apos;/local&apos; --exclude=&apos;/packages&apos;&quot;
PORTAGE_TMPDIR=&quot;/var/tmp&quot;
PORTDIR=&quot;/usr/portage&quot;
SYNC=&quot;rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage&quot;
USE=&quot;x86 X a52 aac acpi alsa apache2 asf berkdb bitmap-fonts cairo cdr cdrom cli cracklib crypt cups dbus divx dlloader dri dts dvd dvdr dvdread eds elibc_glibc emboss encode fam ffmpeg firefox flac fortran gdbm gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk hal iconv input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse ipv6 isdnlog java jpeg kde kdeenablefinal kernel_linux ldap libg++ linguas_de linguas_de_CH linguas_en linguas_en_GB mad mikmod mmx mono mp3 mpeg ncurses nls nptl nptlonly ogg opengl oss pam pcre perl png ppds pppd python qt3 qt4 quicktime readline reflection rtsp ruby samba sdl session smp spell spl sse sse2 sse3 ssl svg tcpd test tetex theora threads truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode userland_GNU vcd video_cards_fbdev video_cards_i810 video_cards_vesa vorbis win32codecs wxwindows x264 xine xml xorg xprint xv xvid zlib&quot;
Unset:  CTARGET, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-20 01:50:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
&gt; there is a problem with this package: dev-python/pycairo
&gt; it depends on &quot;=x11-libs/cairo-1.0*&quot; which will cause a downgrade, which should
&gt; be fixed first. (maybe there are more packages, I just spottet this one)

 Yes, see comment #3</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-20 06:18:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable with pycairo-1.2.2.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-20 23:41:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 walks like an Egyptian.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-24 14:06:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>glitz-0.5.6, cairo-1.2.4, pycairo-1.2.2 stable on ppc64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>borisdusek@cmail.cz</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-25 02:30:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Upgrade from 1.0.4 to 1.2.4 on x86 breaks gtk+ font antialiasing. See #156188.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-25 07:09:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Run revdep-rebuild like the ebuild tells you to.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kloeri@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-25 09:36:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on Alpha + ia64.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-12-01 10:45:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>hppa stable with masked USE=glitz and nuked media-libs/glitz keywords (probably some mistake since we only do fbdev thus rendering glitz unusable/untestable).

As stated on glitz page &quot;The performance and capabilities of glitz are much dependent on graphics hardware. Glitz does not in any way handle software fall-backs when graphics hardware is insufficient. However, glitz will report if any requested operation cannot be carried out by graphics hardware, hence making a higher level software layer responsible for appropriate actions.&quot;
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-25 17:24:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Pointless now.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 167573 ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>