<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>153294</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-10-29 06:56 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>dev-cpp/gtkmm-2.10.2 with -accessibility breaks pkg-config (missing atkmm-1.6)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-05-27 11:08:12 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>GNOME</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366930</bug_file_loc>
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>155616</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>gnome-mm@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>alpha@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>aspanke@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>beber@meleeweb.net</cc>
    
    <cc>belgix@kern.com.au</cc>
    
    <cc>cbm@m.fsf.org</cc>
    
    <cc>daemon@kleczew.com</cc>
    
    <cc>davidepesa@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>dpblnt@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>drwook@users.sourceforge.net</cc>
    
    <cc>dsdale24@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>edi15ta@gazeta.pl</cc>
    
    <cc>eprparadocs@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>frikifeldes@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>gentoo@chlhp.de</cc>
    
    <cc>ia64@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>iyosifov@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>l33tmmx@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>leszek@skynet.be</cc>
    
    <cc>Martin.vGagern@gmx.net</cc>
    
    <cc>maxima.bugs@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>netfab@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>palglowr@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>parmigio@2ainfo.it</cc>
    
    <cc>peter.henriksson@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>peterle@hottemptation.org</cc>
    
    <cc>plaes@plaes.org</cc>
    
    <cc>pookey@pookey.co.uk</cc>
    
    <cc>public@mroot.net</cc>
    
    <cc>renean@gmx.de</cc>
    
    <cc>saintdev@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>scottsshort@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>seventhguardian@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>ssuominen@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>ulm@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>victor.quicksilver@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>voyageur@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-29 06:56:59 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Installing gtkmm-2.10.2 with -accessibility breaks any program that uses pkg-config to work out gtkmm deps:

ciaranm@snowdrop ~ 0 0.18 $ pkg-config --libs gtkmm-2.4
Package atkmm-1.6 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `atkmm-1.6.pc&apos;
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package &apos;atkmm-1.6&apos;, required by &apos;gtkmm&apos;, not found</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-29 22:50:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 153392 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-30 13:04:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 153467 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ralf@ark.in-berlin.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-31 01:07:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Reported upstream:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366930</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-02 09:20:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 153831 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-03 01:25:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 153886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-06 07:58:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 154251 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>allanonjl@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-09 11:22:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 154583 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-15 11:59:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155283 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 04:51:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155571 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 05:06:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155574 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>seventhguardian@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 05:22:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>
The gnome team hasn&apos;t done much yet to solve this. Maybe we should use for now a conditional patch like the one on the upstream tracker.. I&apos;ll see what I can do.

Also, please include the keyword &quot;atkmm&quot; in the summary. This way lots of dups would be avoided. Something like &quot;(...) breaks pkg-config (missing atkmm-1.6)&quot; would do fine.

Cheers,
  Renato</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ssuominen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 05:29:17 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>media-video/bmpx is using this, and so should other ebuilds having this problem I think.

pkg_setup() {
        if has_version &apos;&gt;dev-cpp/gtkmm-2.10&apos; &amp;&amp;! built_with_use dev-cpp/gtkmm accessibility; then
                die &quot;You need to build dev-cpp/gtkmm with USE accessibility.&quot;
        fi
}
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 05:35:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>That&apos;s a horrible solution. It&apos;d involve updating nearly every ebuild that uses gtkmm, and it&apos;d involve going through and removing all those hacks as soon as it&apos;s fixed.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 05:45:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155585 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 05:53:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155585 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>seventhguardian@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 06:09:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>No no no! that solution is indeed awful. The problem is with gtkmm, so the solution should solve the problem and not the symptoms.

I&apos;ve solved the problem in gtkmm by simply applying John Laliberte&apos;s patch conditionaly. It works perfectly, but as said in the upstream bugzila, it should be solved using a var. That&apos;s what I&apos;m doing now.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>seventhguardian@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 06:11:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=102265)
The corrected ebuild

This ebuild works perfectly, but I&apos;m finishing solving this upstream. This will be obsoleted as soon as I finish this.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>seventhguardian@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 06:12:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=102266)
A simplified version of John Laliberte&apos;s patch

The conditionally applied patch</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>seventhguardian@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 06:34:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=102267)
The patch to be submitted upstream

Ok I&apos;ve corrected it for good. Unfortunately I guess it would be difficult to use this patch on the ebuild, as it involves changing configure.in, which would then require the recreation of the configure script, etc.. too much headache.

But the corrected ebuild above already solves the problem gentoo-wise, so it can be used until the upstream publishes the corrected distfile. No more bmpx-like hacks :)

Can someone please submit this patch upstream? I don&apos;t have a gnome account..

cheers
  renato</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>seventhguardian@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 07:05:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=102272)
gtkmm-2.10.2-r1.ebuild

I&apos;ve done a gtkmm-2.10.2-r1.ebuild with the corrections. It should be used before a new version of gtkmm comes out from upstream. Can this be put in cvs along with the gentoo patch (102266)?

By the way, I have a question regarding it. There is SLOT=&quot;2.4&quot; on the ebuild, but I don&apos;t understand why this is set to 2.4 and not 2.10 or just 2.0..

Cheers
  Renato</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 11:35:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 16:22:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155625 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 19:11:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155596 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 22:05:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=102314)
gtkmm-2.10.2-no_atk.patch

an upstream patch can&apos;t be conditional.

needs  dev-cpp/cairomm dependency maybe:

checking for PANGOMM... configure: error: Package requirements (glibmm-2.4 &gt;= 2.12.1 cairomm-1.0 &gt;= 1.1.12 pangocairo &gt;= 1.5.2) were not met:

No package &apos;cairomm-1.0&apos; found

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-18 22:07:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=102315)
gtkmm-2.10.2.ebuild.patch

if you change configure.in you need to eautoconf</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>remi@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-19 02:28:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Daniel, your configure.in patch looks very similar to what I posted upstream yesterday. However, your updated src_unpack() should probably model the one from gnome2.eclass which has an added gnome2_omf_fix call inside.

Other than that, it works for me.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>seventhguardian@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-19 04:43:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #25)
&gt; Created an attachment (id=102315) [edit]
&gt; gtkmm-2.10.2.ebuild.patch
&gt; 
&gt; if you change configure.in you need to eautoconf
&gt; 
Yes, that&apos;s why I said to use John&apos;s patch instead of the mine for now.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>peterle@hottemptation.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-19 09:43:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>new release in portage, when?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>remi@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-19 13:03:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;m ready to commit the patch I sent upstream but repoman shows gtkmm is broken on alpha, ppc64 and x86-fbsd. Flameeyes gave me the go order for x86-fbsd to keep the arch for now.

Alpha and PPC64, gtkmm won&apos;t compile on your arches with or without the patch. Should I keep KEYWORDS as is?

Thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>remi@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-19 13:37:28 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155716 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ssuominen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-20 07:23:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155768 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-20 13:53:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155795 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-20 14:37:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155806 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-20 15:10:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155809 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>remi@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-21 00:21:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ok folks, I&apos;ve finally committed the patch. This is my first commit to portage so please please tell me if something fscks up.

Alpha and PPC64, i&apos;ve committed the revbumped ebuild without your two arches.

Closing bug, please reopen if things go wrong.

Thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nyhm@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-21 02:21:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 155843 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ranger@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-21 10:44:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>marked ppc64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ranger@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-21 11:26:59 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>disregard my previous comment, adding ppc64 back in</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>public@mroot.net</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-21 12:21:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Hm, this is still not fixed for me, I just synced at 2006-11-21 19:40 CET, recompiled gtkmm and I&apos;m still getting this error:

[...]
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for LIBGNOMEMM... configure: error: Package requirements (gtkmm-2.4 &gt;= 
2.4.0 libgnome-2.0 &gt;= 2.6.0) were not met.
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively you may set the LIBGNOMEMM_CFLAGS and LIBGNOMEMM_LIBS environment variables
to avoid the need to call pkg-config.  See the pkg-config man page for
more details.

!!! Please attach the following file when filing a report to bugs.gentoo.org:
!!! /var/tmp/portage/dev-cpp/libgnomemm-2.12.2/work/libgnomemm-2.12.2/config.log

!!! ERROR: dev-cpp/libgnomemm-2.12.2 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1568:   Called dyn_compile
  ebuild.sh, line 937:   Called src_compile
  libgnomemm-2.12.2.ebuild, line 30:   Called gnome2_src_compile
  gnome2.eclass, line 63:   Called gnome2_src_configure
  gnome2.eclass, line 59:   Called econf &apos;--enable-gtk-doc&apos;
  ebuild.sh, line 540:   Called die

!!! econf failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.

What am I doing wrong?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>remi@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-21 12:34:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc64: looks good now, dropping you from CC

arm, ia64, sh: like alpha, gtkmm-2.10.2{,-r1} will refuse to build on your arches because of unkeyworded deps. If you guys could please keyword the following packages or drop yourselves from gtkmm :

~alpha &gt;=dev-cpp/cairomm-1.1.12

~arm   &gt;=dev-cpp/cairomm-1.1.12
       &gt;=dev-cpp/glibmm-2.12.1

~ia64  &gt;=dev-cpp/cairomm-1.1.12

~sh    &gt;=dev-cpp/cairomm-1.1.12
       &gt;=dev-cpp/glibmm-2.12.1

Thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>remi@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-21 12:37:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>@Martin :

This is not what this bug is about, if you could file another bug for it, providing all info emerge gives you.

Thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>public@mroot.net</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-21 12:51:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>&gt; @Martin :
&gt; 
&gt; This is not what this bug is about, if you could file another bug for it,
&gt; providing all info emerge gives you.

Hm, weird. There was a bug report, bug #155596 , that has been marked as a duplicate of this one. So, what shall I do?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>seventhguardian@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-21 13:00:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #42)
&gt; &gt; @Martin :
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; This is not what this bug is about, if you could file another bug for it,
&gt; &gt; providing all info emerge gives you.
&gt; 
&gt; Hm, weird. There was a bug report, bug #155596 , that has been marked as a
&gt; duplicate of this one. So, what shall I do?
&gt; 

That bug was correctly identified as a dup of this one. It&apos;s different from yours. The problem here is (was) with gtkmm and not gnomemm. Please compare the error outputs.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>public@mroot.net</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-21 13:29:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ok, thanks. Please excuse me for my error.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-05-25 13:44:29 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 179750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>peterle@hottemptation.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-05-27 11:08:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Will gtkmm become ever stable?
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="1"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>102265</attachid>
            <date>2006-11-18 06:11 0000</date>
            <desc>The corrected ebuild</desc>
            <filename>gtkmm-2.10.2.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA2IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k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</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="1"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>102266</attachid>
            <date>2006-11-18 06:12 0000</date>
            <desc>A simplified version of John Laliberte&apos;s patch</desc>
            <filename>gtkmm-2.10.2-no_atk.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIGd0a21tLTIuMTAuMi9ndGsvZ3RrbW0tMi40LnBjLmluCisrKyBndGttbS0yLjEwLjIvZ3Rr
L2d0a21tLTIuNC5wYy5pbgpAQCAtNSw3ICs1LDcgQEAKIAogTmFtZTogZ3RrbW0KIERlc2NyaXB0
aW9uOiBDKysgd3JhcHBlciBmb3IgR1RLKwotUmVxdWlyZXM6IGdsaWJtbS0yLjQgZ2RrbW0tMi40
IHBhbmdvbW0tMS40IGF0a21tLTEuNiBndGsrLTIuMAorUmVxdWlyZXM6IGdsaWJtbS0yLjQgZ2Rr
bW0tMi40IHBhbmdvbW0tMS40IGd0aystMi4wCiBWZXJzaW9uOiBAVkVSU0lPTkAKIExpYnM6IC1M
JHtsaWJkaXJ9IC1sZ3RrbW0tMi40CiBDZmxhZ3M6IC1JJHtpbmNsdWRlZGlyfS9ndGttbS0yLjQg
LUkke2xpYmRpcn0vZ3RrbW0tMi40L2luY2x1ZGUK
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="1"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>102267</attachid>
            <date>2006-11-18 06:34 0000</date>
            <desc>The patch to be submitted upstream</desc>
            <filename>no_atk.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIGd0a21tLTIuMTAuMi9jb25maWd1cmUuaW4JMjAwNi0wOS0yMSAyMDo0ODoyMC4wMDAwMDAw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</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="1"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>102272</attachid>
            <date>2006-11-18 07:05 0000</date>
            <desc>gtkmm-2.10.2-r1.ebuild</desc>
            <filename>gtkmm-2.10.2-r1.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA2IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k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</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>102314</attachid>
            <date>2006-11-18 22:05 0000</date>
            <desc>gtkmm-2.10.2-no_atk.patch</desc>
            <filename>gtkmm-2.10.2-no_atk.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIC4uLy4uL2d0a21tLTIuMTAuMi93b3JrL2d0a21tLTIuMTAuMi9jb25maWd1cmUuaW4JMjAw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=
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>102315</attachid>
            <date>2006-11-18 22:07 0000</date>
            <desc>gtkmm-2.10.2.ebuild.patch</desc>
            <filename>gtkmm-2.10.2.ebuild.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIC91c3IvcG9ydGFnZS9kZXYtY3BwL2d0a21tL2d0a21tLTIuMTAuMi5lYnVpbGQJMjAwNi0x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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>