<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>150300</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-10-06 10:33 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>games-strategy/savage-bin-2.00e version bump needed</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-10-13 07:21:52 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Games</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>FlorianManschwetus@gmx.de</reporter>
          <assigned_to>games@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>FlorianManschwetus@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-06 10:33:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>infos here
http://www.s2games.com/savage/downloads.php

file here
http://www.happypuppy.com/s2games/Savage_with_sep3t.run

I don&apos;t know what should be changed in ebuild, there are also two concurating enhancements mentioned, so a useflag may be useful</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-06 13:38:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>umm... it *has* that already... in fact, it has 3t+ and the 3t++ hotfix... ;]</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>FlorianManschwetus@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-06 16:27:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>then you should set the version accordingly, or not?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>FlorianManschwetus@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-07 05:36:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>and the links in the ebuild should be fixed!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>FlorianManschwetus@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-07 06:23:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>so as result of the version modification upstream the ebuild is broken</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-09 08:01:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Huh?

I&apos;m sorry, but I&apos;m not understanding what you think is a problem.  Please attach a patch with the fixes you are referring to.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>FlorianManschwetus@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-09 08:23:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>the ebuild isn&apos;t working anymore and the version upstream is higher.
no patch because the changed installation needs more modification in ebuild as i am able to do.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-09 14:02:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>OK.  I apparently did not make myself clear enough.

We are installing 2.00e, *AND* SEP 3T *AND* SEP 3T+-r2 in our ebuild.  So *please* tell me what *exactly* you think it is that I am not doing here.  I&apos;m not able to guess from your cryptic answers.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-09 14:45:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>OK.  Someone else pointed out what I think might be the problem.  I&apos;m looking into it now.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-13 07:21:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>OK... bumped to the proper version now</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>