14971 2003-02-02 08:33 0000 ctags not found by kdevelop 2005-07-17 13:06:51 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux KDE 1.4_rc2 x86 Linux RESOLVED DUPLICATE P2 minor --- 1 douglas.pollock@magma.ca kde@gentoo.org douglas.pollock@magma.ca mkennedy@gentoo.org douglas.pollock@magma.ca 2003-02-02 08:33:20 0000 ctags (5.2.3) installs itself as exuberant-ctags, while kdevelop is looking for ctags. Doesn't find it during initial "setup wizard" stuff. A soft link is "/usr/bin" from "/usr/bin/exuberant-ctags" to "ctags" seems to work well. hannes@gentoo.org 2003-02-02 14:51:13 0000 please look into bug #8113, this is probably a duplicate of #8113. douglas.pollock@magma.ca 2003-02-02 17:19:05 0000 It looks related, but they seem to be having a debate as to how to build dependencies for kdevelop. (In fact, it looks like ctags may have been added in response to that bug?) But, I'm not having problems with that at all. I like the ctags dependency just fine, but someone hasn't made a link for it in the "/usr/bin" directory: doug@dragon doug $ man exuberant-ctags CTAGS(1) CTAGS(1) NAME ctags - Generate tag files for source code SYNOPSIS ctags [options] [file(s)] etags [options] [file(s)] It should be a simple fix. One line in the ebuild. I don't ask too much.... ;) hannes@gentoo.org 2003-02-02 19:22:40 0000 ok, let me quote ctags ebuild: # namepace collision with X/Emacs-provided /usr/bin/ctags -- we # rename ctags to exuberant-ctags (Mandrake does this also). maybe we should patch kdevelop to have support for ctags named exuberant-ctags? mkennedy: since you committed ctags-5.2.3 ebuild, maybe you can help here? hannes@gentoo.org 2003-02-04 13:42:29 0000 his is fixed in kdevelop-2.1.5.ebuild (and i'll fix it in 3.x ebuilds soon) hannes@gentoo.org 2003-02-04 13:42:48 0000 this is fixed in kdevelop-2.1.5.ebuild (and i'll fix it in 3.x ebuilds soon) hannes@gentoo.org 2003-02-16 14:19:30 0000 marking as duplicate of the initial bug, this is fixed in kdevelop-2.1.5 (and has to be fixed in kdevelop-3.x). Thanks for reporting. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8113 ***