<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>148419</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-09-20 14:11 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>kmplayer 0.9.3 with binary mplayer on amd64 needs testing</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-10-09 10:49:24 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>KDE</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WORKSFORME</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>deathwing00@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>amd64@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>kde@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>deathwing00@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-09-20 14:11:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Please, test that the patch supplied works correctly (test all kmplayer functionalities) when using mplayer-bin under amd64.

I have reported upstream that these harcoded mplayer entries are becoming annoying. Hope they do something about it.

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134418</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>deathwing00@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-09-20 14:23:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Nevermind, upstream confirmed that mplayer can be set from within the configuration menu from this version and on.

Do the amd64 users still want this patch on this version or should I drop it and add an einfo?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>deathwing00@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-09-20 14:25:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Can you guys still try that the feature works correctly before I perform any change?

------- Additional Comment #2 From Koos Vriezen  2006-09-20 23:18 -------
Have you tried the MPlayer config tab in kmplayer&apos;s configure dialog? As of this 0.9.3 release, you should be able to set MPlayer&apos;s binary name (and even it&apos;s complete path)
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-09 10:12:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ioannis, can you just go on with the change? I haven&apos;t tested it (load of kde deps) but if it doesn&apos;t work out, we&apos;ll soon notice it. It is testing after all, users can expect minor breakage :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>deathwing00@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-09 10:16:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>It&apos;s already in the tree. I just wanted to be sure that it worked for everyone. If no one has complained to the moment, maybe things are alright anyway.

MEMORANDUM: Do not create mplayer-bin patch for amd64 on next version.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-09 10:23:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Sure?

kmplayer-0.9.3.ebuild:

src_unpack() {
    kde_src_unpack

    if use mplayer &amp;&amp; use amd64 &amp;&amp; ! has_version media-video/mplayer; then
        epatch &quot;${FILESDIR}/${P}-use32bitbin.diff&quot;
    fi
}
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>deathwing00@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-09 10:31:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I was thinking in allowing the patch in there, but if you insist... :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>deathwing00@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-09 10:49:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fixed in CVS.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>