143603 2006-08-11 13:02 0000 media-gfx/digikam-0.9.0-beta1 and media-plugins/digikamimageplugins-0.9.0-beta1 released 2006-08-13 13:50:27 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED http://www.digikam.org/?q=node/130 P4 enhancement --- 143584 1 deathwing00@gentoo.org kde@gentoo.org deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-11 13:02:29 0000 Bump will be performed after bug #143584 is resolved. Sources: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42641 deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-13 08:02:05 0000 I noticed that digikam can support exiv2. I'll add a use flag to this new ebuild for exiv2 support. deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-13 08:09:40 0000 I can confirm that the support for exiv2 was added since this version of digikam. deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-13 08:54:26 0000 The following keywords were not added due to lack of exiv2 support: ~ia64 ~alpha deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-13 08:59:49 0000 Also added lcms support to the ebuild as stated in the NEWS file. deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-13 09:18:01 0000 General : Removed imlib2 and libkexif depencies. Add Exiv2 and LCMS depencies. deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-13 09:31:11 0000 Fixed in CVS. deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-13 09:34:56 0000 digikam in CVS, digikamimageplugins pending deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-13 10:20:18 0000 All fixed in CVS. deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-13 10:21:13 0000 I've also fixed the documentation so that it uses 0.8.2 from versions 0.8.2 and above. deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-13 10:36:53 0000 I didn't fix the documentation for digikam, I am unable to locate the image doc tarballs. Only fixed for digikamimageplugins. sebroeder@gmail.com 2006-08-13 12:25:01 0000 I would propose not to include any docs for the beta release cause they are VERY inaccurate/outdated. The final release will have updated docs of cause. Bundeling the new beta with the old docs will only lead to confused users (there are huge interface changes for example) and is furthermore a waste of bandwith. Just my 2 cents, otherwise thanks for the ebuilds. deathwing00@gentoo.org 2006-08-13 13:50:27 0000 (In reply to comment #11) > I would propose not to include any docs for the beta release cause they are > VERY inaccurate/outdated. The final release will have updated docs of cause. > Bundeling the new beta with the old docs will only lead to confused users > (there are huge interface changes for example) and is furthermore a waste of > bandwith. Just my 2 cents, otherwise thanks for the ebuilds. Once the finaly documents are released, I'll make sure they get updated. As far as the ebuild works, I'll leave it as is.