<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>143378</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-08-09 12:36 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>www-apps/egroupware-1.2.106 stable request</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-03-06 15:29:49 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>143376</dependson>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>rockoo@gmail.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>alpha@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>chris@novazur.fr</cc>
    
    <cc>gblist@communicationvalley.it</cc>
    
    <cc>gentoo4u@vplace.de</cc>
    
    <cc>lordvan@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>Mark@JumpingBean.co.za</cc>
    
    <cc>rossi.f@inwind.it</cc>
    
    <cc>web-apps@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rockoo@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-09 12:36:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>www-apps/egroupware-1.2 stable request

- works fine on x86 w/ php-5.1
- no bugs-in-zilla</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rl03@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-02 13:52:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>this would go a lot faster if you added the arches</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-02 14:01:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Renat: Daniel acted just the right way here. Usually the maintainer CCs the arches so that they can be sure the maintainer is okay with the stablization. Otherwise we&apos;d just have to ask, which probably wouldn&apos;t take less time, or we could accidentally stablize even if the maintainer didn&apos;t want to, because he knew of some bugs. That being said, your comment sounded rather rude to me, I hope it wasn&apos;t meant that way.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rl03@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-02 14:04:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>learn something new every day

no intention of being rude, simply being brief</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-08 19:24:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc doesn&apos;t have a stable.
also the keywords seems to have appeared magically at some point (nothing mentioned in the changelog).
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-09 12:09:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>web-apps, which 1.2 version do you want?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rockoo@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-09 19:43:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>i&apos;m using 1.2.106 on x86 w/ dev-lang/php-5.1.6-r6 + dev-php5/jpgraph-2.1.3 - with 50 users. the .105 also works fine for a long time now.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rl03@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-09 20:02:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>.106 is fine by me</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-10 08:59:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nixnut@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-12 20:51:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on ppc</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-24 18:26:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable for HPPA.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-24 19:07:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Thought I might keyword dev-php4/jpgraph too. Testing in progress...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-24 19:09:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Sheesh</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-25 06:08:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>HPPA done.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-12 17:31:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chris@novazur.fr</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-13 20:58:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>seems there is a new stable version ?
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=78745
someone working on the ebuild, please ?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rl03@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-13 21:02:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>To quote their website:

The latest stable release of eGroupWare is 1.2.106. </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chris@novazur.fr</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-13 21:08:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #16)
&gt; To quote their website:
&gt; 
&gt; The latest stable release of eGroupWare is 1.2.106. 
&gt; 

yes, but when follow the link to download the lastest stable version, you have this new version. So I thought the home page wasn&apos;t just updated
Sorry if I made a mistake.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rl03@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-13 21:11:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Seems weird to me that a stable version would be called 1.4 Beta 1.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chris@novazur.fr</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-13 21:25:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Sorry, I just looked at the file name, not the header :
eGroupWare-1.3-015.tar.bz2
and it doesn&apos;t mention beta version.
So, the link &quot;follow this link to our stable relase&quot; here http://www.egroupware.org/download?lang=en is not really good, not only my fault :-)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>yoswink@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-03-06 15:29:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>alpha stable. All done. Thanks.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>