139505 2006-07-06 19:19 0000 stable request dev-lang/swig-1.3.25 2006-07-18 06:09:31 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Applications 2006.0 All Linux RESOLVED DUPLICATE P2 normal --- 1 agaffney@gentoo.org chriswhite@gentoo.org fauli@gentoo.org agaffney@gentoo.org 2006-07-06 19:19:51 0000 In my x86 catalyst builds, I ran across the issue of swig-1.3.21 failing to build with gcc4. I stabled 1.3.25 in my snapshot, and it built just fine. This version is already stable on a few arches. chriswhite@gentoo.org 2006-07-06 19:43:11 0000 The original bug report was for a gcc4 failure. Looking at the ChangeLog it seems ppc was effected by this too, so I'd rather chuck this across the board. So here's the keywords lowdown: alpha ~amd64 ~arm hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ~ppc-macos ppc64 ~s390 ~sparc ~x86 So I need amd64, mips, ppc-macos, s390 (which is like Spanky and that's it I think), sparc, and x86 to mark swig-1.3.21 stable on their perspective arches. As a future roadmap I'll be looking at 1.3.29 after a month. fauli@gentoo.org 2006-07-06 23:12:14 0000 Is this bug connected in any way to bug #117218 ? To me it seems so. wolf31o2@gentoo.org 2006-07-07 07:02:07 0000 So shouldn't this be marked as a DUPE and have the arches added to the other bug? Anyway, x86/amd64 done... so no need to add them if you do DUPE it. gustavoz@gentoo.org 2006-07-10 14:48:35 0000 sparc stable. grobian@gentoo.org 2006-07-15 07:00:09 0000 We're not stable in any swig as far as I can see. Because of the USE-flags which require stuff which is not there, I'd rather not stable this on ppc-macos. wolf31o2@gentoo.org 2006-07-18 06:09:31 0000 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 117218 ***