<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>139236</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-07-04 13:10 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-arch/file-roller dependence on gnome-base/nautilus</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-10-28 22:02:02 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>2006.0</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>140858</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>moloh@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>gnome@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>Dekvardo@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>zeksers@gmail.com</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>moloh@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-04 13:10:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>By default app-arch/file-roller has dependence on nautilus, but it could be disabled and compiled without it (configure --disable-nautilus-actions flag). It could be possible to add USE=&quot;gnome&quot; flag to build these additional extensions.
Also if You add this to ebuild it could be possible to use file-roller without big nautilus dependencies on desktops that don&apos;t want to use full gnome suite (like xfce based).</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-04 15:01:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>There are at least 10 other Gnome dependencies, sorry but gnome use flag really doesn&apos;t make sense to disable nautilus.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>moloh@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-04 15:20:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; There are at least 10 other Gnome dependencies, sorry but gnome use flag really
&gt; doesn&apos;t make sense to disable nautilus.
&gt; 

In my case:
# emerge file-roller -t
[ebuild  N    ] app-arch/file-roller-2.12.3  USE=&quot;-debug&quot; 914 kB
[ebuild  N    ]  gnome-base/nautilus-2.12.2  USE=&quot;X -debug&quot; 3,962 kB
[ebuild  N    ]   gnome-base/eel-2.12.2  USE=&quot;X -debug&quot; 660 kB
[ebuild  N    ]    gnome-base/gnome-menus-2.12.0-r1  USE=&quot;-debug&quot; 384 kB
[ebuild  N    ]    gnome-base/gail-1.8.8  USE=&quot;-debug -doc&quot; 568 kB
[ebuild  N    ]   gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.12.3  USE=&quot;-debug&quot; 1,011 kB
[ebuild  N    ]   media-sound/esound-0.2.36-r1  USE=&quot;alsa tcpd -debug -ipv6 -static&quot; 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ]   sys-apps/eject-2.1.0-r1  USE=&quot;nls&quot; 65 kB

Yes, i know it&apos;is almost </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>moloh@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-04 15:20:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; There are at least 10 other Gnome dependencies, sorry but gnome use flag really
&gt; doesn&apos;t make sense to disable nautilus.
&gt; 

In my case:
# emerge file-roller -t
[ebuild  N    ] app-arch/file-roller-2.12.3  USE=&quot;-debug&quot; 914 kB
[ebuild  N    ]  gnome-base/nautilus-2.12.2  USE=&quot;X -debug&quot; 3,962 kB
[ebuild  N    ]   gnome-base/eel-2.12.2  USE=&quot;X -debug&quot; 660 kB
[ebuild  N    ]    gnome-base/gnome-menus-2.12.0-r1  USE=&quot;-debug&quot; 384 kB
[ebuild  N    ]    gnome-base/gail-1.8.8  USE=&quot;-debug -doc&quot; 568 kB
[ebuild  N    ]   gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.12.3  USE=&quot;-debug&quot; 1,011 kB
[ebuild  N    ]   media-sound/esound-0.2.36-r1  USE=&quot;alsa tcpd -debug -ipv6 -static&quot; 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ]   sys-apps/eject-2.1.0-r1  USE=&quot;nls&quot; 65 kB

Yes, i know it&apos;is almost nothing for *optional* file-roller feature.
But answer this one, if it doesn&apos;t make sense then why there is that option for totem (same case with nautilus)?
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>allanonjl@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-07 19:07:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>bug re-opened per email</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>allanonjl@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-07 19:09:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>gnome herd members:

what do you think about this?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>steev@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-07 19:21:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Personally, I would agree with it, even though I use Gnome as my desktop.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>moloh@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-11 15:28:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>May i know what would be decision here?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>zeksers@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-22 13:48:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>BreakMyGentoo even has an ebuild for this already.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>moloh@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-30 18:32:21 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Hey guys... close it or fix it. It&apos;s simple request.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>remi@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-31 01:31:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Could you post a patch (either your own or BMG&apos;s) here for review? Thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>moloh@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-31 11:38:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=93133)
file-roller-2.14.3.ebuild

Proposed ebuild for file-roller, modified according to official totem ebuild (USE=&quot;gnome&quot; to add nautilus support, on BMG there is USE=&quot;nautilus&quot; flag to do that, but in my opinion it&apos;s better to use &quot;gnome&quot; flag to do that, because it is used by default, user don&apos;t have to modify any local flags to get normal gnomish bahaviour of package)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>Dekvardo@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-21 05:00:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Please add this fix to the tree and close this bug.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>compnerd@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-10-28 22:02:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Added to 2.16.0 ebuild.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>93133</attachid>
            <date>2006-07-31 11:38 0000</date>
            <desc>file-roller-2.14.3.ebuild</desc>
            <filename>file-roller-2.14.3.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA2IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>