<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>138499</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-06-29 09:35 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Feature request: terminate sandbox immediately on access violation</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-07-04 07:33:38 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Portage Development</product>
          <component>Sandbox</component>
          <version>2.1</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>ed@catmur.co.uk</reporter>
          <assigned_to>sandbox@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>unledev+b.g.o@gmail.com</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ed@catmur.co.uk</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-29 09:35:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>In some situations, it would make debugging sandbox violations easier if the sandbox were to terminate immediately. This could be controlled by env var SANDBOX_TERMINATE. I guess libsandbox needs to signal the process group?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unledev+b.g.o@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-30 18:05:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>kill()ing the process group should do it. I&apos;ll be looking into this in the weeks to come, as I have to debug some ebuilds failing to emerge in g/fbsd. I&apos;ll update this bug report if I come with any useful patch.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>azarah@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-04 07:33:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Theoretically added this to svn.  Uses SANDBOX_ABORT=1.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>