<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>138194</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-06-27 06:21 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Stabilization request: mdadm 2.5.2</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-08-23 16:31:25 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>blocker</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>base-system@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>release@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>stuart@hickinbottom.com</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 06:21:36 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>We really need this stable if we&apos;re planning on making GCC 4.1.1 stable on any arches for the release.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gmsoft@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 06:34:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on hppa.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 09:28:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on ppc64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 09:52:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tsunam@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 22:32:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 is done ^.^; Always so easy to test when I actually use it fairly often.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tsunam@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 22:35:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>helps to remove us *whistle*

I&apos;m not blonde I swear &gt;^.^&lt;</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>neil@darlow.co.uk</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-28 02:19:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Don&apos;t rush into stability on this.

When built with the ssl useflag, mdadm fails to locate libcrypto.so.0.9.7 on startup and shutdown.

I don&apos;t know if this is a /usr/lib availability issue?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>agaffney@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-28 05:44:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; Don&apos;t rush into stability on this.
&gt; 
&gt; When built with the ssl useflag, mdadm fails to locate libcrypto.so.0.9.7 on
&gt; startup and shutdown.
&gt; 
&gt; I don&apos;t know if this is a /usr/lib availability issue?

Have you filed a bug for this?
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-28 11:02:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable.
@neil: if you&apos;re using it for a initrd/initramfs you really want USE=static or ditch ssl.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>vapier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-28 18:50:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>dont bother filing a bug, mdadm-2.5.1 no longer utilizes openssl</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>stuart@hickinbottom.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-05 02:57:36 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Whilst 2.5-r1 compiles and works fine for me now it&apos;s been stabilised, there is a severe memory leak when it&apos;s run in daemon mode that makes my system unusable after about two days.

This is known about upstream (http://neil.brown.name/blog/20060526101457), and is  reported as being resolved in 2.5.1.

So, not sure what the recommendation is here - either mark this unstable again, or consider 2.5.1 for stabilisation instead (I&apos;m not sure what issues there may be with the latter).</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-05 06:54:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Mike?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kingtaco@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-05 07:55:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #11)
&gt; Mike?
&gt; 

Which Mike?  Can the fix be backported?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>vapier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-05 11:40:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>2.5.2 is in the tree to address the memory leak</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-05 12:33:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Sorry, SpanKY...  Should we be stabilizing a newer version here?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>vapier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-05 14:59:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>2.5.2 addresses the two known issues with 2.5-r1 (ssl linkage/memory leak) and has no known issues ... then again, 2.5 had no known issues until it went stable ;)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-07 07:10:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Alright, I guess we need 2.5.2, then.  Sorry arch teams... Adding everyone back...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-07 11:34:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on ppc64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jwk@bug.it</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-07 15:22:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>works for me on x86.

emerge --info follows:

Portage 2.1-r1 (default-linux/x86/2006.0, gcc-3.4.6, glibc-2.3.6-r4, 2.6.16-gentoo-r9 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.16-gentoo-r9 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1000MHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.15
dev-lang/python:     2.4.3-r1
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     [Not Present]
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r7
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.13-r2
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=&quot;x86&quot;
AUTOCLEAN=&quot;yes&quot;
CBUILD=&quot;i686-pc-linux-gnu&quot;
CFLAGS=&quot;-mtune=pentium4 -O3 -pipe&quot;
CHOST=&quot;i686-pc-linux-gnu&quot;
CONFIG_PROTECT=&quot;/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config&quot;CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK=&quot;/etc/env.d /etc/gconf /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo&quot;
CXXFLAGS=&quot;-mtune=pentium4 -O3 -pipe&quot;
DISTDIR=&quot;/usr/portage/distfiles&quot;
FEATURES=&quot;autoconfig collision-protect distlocks metadata-transfer sandbox sfperms strict&quot;
GENTOO_MIRRORS=&quot;http://www.die.unipd.it/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo-sources http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo&quot;
PKGDIR=&quot;/usr/portage/packages&quot;
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS=&quot;--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180 --exclude=&apos;/distfiles&apos; --exclude=&apos;/local&apos; --exclude=&apos;/packages&apos;&quot;
PORTAGE_TMPDIR=&quot;/var/tmp&quot;
PORTDIR=&quot;/usr/portage&quot;
SYNC=&quot;rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage&quot;
USE=&quot;x86 X alsa apache2 apm arts avi berkdb bitmap-fonts cli crypt cups dlloader dri eds emboss encode esd foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 imlib ipv6 isdnlog java jpeg kde libg++ libwww mad mailwrapper mikmod motif mp3 mpeg ncurses nls nptl ogg opengl oss pam pcre pdflib perl png pppd python qt qt3 qt4 quicktime readline reflection sdl session s pell spl ssl tcpd truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev vorbis xml xmms xorg xv zlib elibc_glibc input_devices_keyboard i nput_devices_mouse input_devices_evdev kernel_linux userland_GNU&quot;
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, MAKEOPTS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kumba@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-08 19:34:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The mips team doth annoint this bug with the Mark of Stability +1.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tsunam@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-10 20:57:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 done ^.^</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-12 06:54:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable and missing from the CC too...
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dang@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-15 11:20:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 done.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-16 03:36:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc/hppa stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tcort@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-23 16:31:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>alpha done by wolf...

  23 Aug 2006; Chris Gianelloni &lt;wolf31o2@gentoo.org&gt; mdadm-2.5.2.ebuild:
  Stable on alpha wrt release snapshot.


Closing since we are the last arch.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>