<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>138125</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-06-26 17:01 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>mail-client/mutt: IMAP Buffer Overflow (CVE-2006-3242)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-09-03 03:42:41 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Security</product>
          <component>Vulnerabilities</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://secunia.com/advisories/20810/</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>A2 [glsa] hlieberman</status_whiteboard>
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>hlieberman@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>security@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>agriffis@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>ferdy@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>hlieberman@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>mips@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>hlieberman@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-26 17:01:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Takahashi Tamotsu discovered a buffer overflow that can cause a DoS, and possibly arbitrary code execution with the privs. of the user running mutt.  Note that a user must visit a malicious IMAP server in order to be affected by this. 

Vulnerable in: =&lt;1.4.2.1
Unaffected in: CVS</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>hlieberman@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-26 17:08:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fixed Severity -- Sorry &apos;bout that.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>hlieberman@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-26 17:19:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Though we appear to be out of the affected version range, Falco believes that we are still vulnerable. 

Herd, can you run a sanity check on this one?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ferdy@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 03:23:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I patched imap/browse.c in our ebuild and added it as mutt-1.5.11-r2

- ferdy</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>falco@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 03:52:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Thanks ferdy

hi arches, please mark 1.5.11-r2 as stable, thank you</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>birder@ozemail.com.au</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 05:03:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Hi ferdy,

Is there any reason why mutt isn&apos;t using autoconf-2.60?  I can&apos;t install the new ebuild because it requires a downgrade autoconf to 2.59-r7, resulting in dependency ping-pong.  (maildrop is another package still using 2.59.)

Cheers,</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>grobian@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 05:07:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Probably because otherwise ppc-macos cannot compile any more.  I don&apos;t know if a &gt;= is possible.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>birder@ozemail.com.au</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 05:16:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; Probably because otherwise ppc-macos cannot compile any more.  I don&apos;t know if
&gt; a &gt;= is possible.

Works for me (x86.)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ferdy@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 06:27:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Because I forgot to remove that dependencies, sorry. Should work now. (worked for me in alpha and x86 at least).

I just commit a new version of -r2 without explicit dependencies and without WANT_AUTOCONF.

- ferdy</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>exg@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 08:56:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 09:12:28 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on ppc64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>grobian@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 10:03:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc-macos done.  I also ported the patch to muttng and included the patch there.  muttng-20060619-r1 has the patch included.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 10:30:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 done... if we&apos;re supposed to do soemthing with muttng, add us back</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>killerfox@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 11:53:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on hppa</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ferdy@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 12:03:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Alpha done.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 12:35:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>metalgod@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-27 19:41:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>falco@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-28 03:06:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This was fast, thanks.

Let&apos;s go for the GLSA</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-28 11:49:17 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Updated CVE info.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>hlieberman@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-28 13:38:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>GLSA 200606-27 committed. Good job everyone.

http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200606-27.xml</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>hlieberman@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-28 13:39:29 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>&amp;nsbp;</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-28 21:55:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Harlan please don&apos;t close security bugs:-)

Mail is finally out on announce.

GLSA 200606-27

mips, ia64 don&apos;t forget to mark stable to benifit from the GLSA.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>