<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>136739</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-06-13 22:50 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>transcode appears not to need libexif (a requirement)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-08-21 10:51:48 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>QAbaddep</keywords>
          <priority>P4</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>throw_away_2002@yahoo.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>media-video@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>jakub@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>throw_away_2002@yahoo.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-13 22:50:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I could have this completely wrong (which has happened mary times before).

The ebuild for media-video/transcode-1.0.2-r2 shows media-libs/libexif as a required dependency via the RDEPEND variable.

I can find nothing either in the documentation or the source code to indicate this.

If transcode does in fact not need this package (and I don&apos;t even see how it could even use it), then I request the removal of this dependency from the ebuild.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-14 01:05:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Well, it&apos;s been added b/c someone said it&apos;s needed (Bug 43907). It doesn&apos;t link against it at all here, I&apos;ve checked all the binaries.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>beandog@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-19 10:53:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; Well, it&apos;s been added b/c someone said it&apos;s needed (Bug 43907). It doesn&apos;t link
&gt; against it at all here, I&apos;ve checked all the binaries.
&gt; 

Plus, that bug was for pre-1.0
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>beandog@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-21 10:51:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fixed in CVS, -r3

Thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>