<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>136490</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-06-11 15:28 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>media-libs/flac-1.1.2-r8 stable request</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-08-06 02:55:49 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Library</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>nigelenki@comcast.net</reporter>
          <assigned_to>mips@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>sound@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nigelenki@comcast.net</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-11 15:28:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Confirmed in #gentoo, Bug in Ubuntu 49283 also affects Gentoo.  libFLAC has a set PT_GNU_STACK marking.

Add the following block to the end of each src/libFLAC/ia32/*.nasm

; PT_GNU_STACK so we don&apos;t get a +X stack
%ifidn __OUTPUT_FORMAT__,elf
section .note.GNU-stack noalloc noexec nowrite progbits
%endif</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>flameeyes@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-12 00:27:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Which version are you referring to? The latest version of flac (and afair also the stable version) applies the patch 120_all_noexecstack that fixes this already.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>zak.kipling@cantab.net</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-10 19:15:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable is 1.1.2-r3, which has PATCHLEVEL=1 -- and flac-patches-1.tar.bz2 *DOESN&apos;T* contain this patch

1.1.2-r8 and 1.1.3 (both marked ~arch for all arches) use PATCHLEVEL=8 and 10 respectively -- and so *DO* have the patch.

So this is fixed, but the fixed version isn&apos;t marked stable yet.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>flameeyes@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-10 19:30:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Okay now makes more sense. I still wonder why this was pointed at a bug in Ubuntu I couldn&apos;t care less (as I reported the fix upstream myself) and this was reported as bug #114984 in Gentoo already, but whatever.

To the reporter, you should usually report _which_ version of a package you&apos;re reporting about, and not report boilerplates problem that are already handled somehow.

Executable stacks are usually non-critical so they don&apos;t require an early stable, but I suppose that the latest 1.1.2-r8 is now good enough for stable as it&apos;s in the tree since 26th September.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-10 22:42:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-11 14:41:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-11 21:49:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nixnut@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-12 18:33:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on ppc</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-16 05:28:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable for HPPA</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-01-29 12:44:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>arm stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>beandog@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-02-04 06:06:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>armin76@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-05-21 16:08:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>alpha stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kumba@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-08-06 02:55:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>mips stable.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>