136324 2006-06-10 14:26 0000 VTK 4.2.6. Is TCLTK an option or not? 2006-06-19 15:07:48 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified x86 Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 daniel.tourde@bredband.net markusle@gentoo.org sci@gentoo.org daniel.tourde@bredband.net 2006-06-10 14:26:50 0000 Hello, In VTK 4.2.6, is TCLTK optional or not? Even though I do not wish to have TCLTK support in VTK, the ebuild triggers the build of TCL and TK: mhordraid ted # emerge -pv vtk These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild N ] dev-util/cmake-2.0.6-r1 USE="-debug" 1,593 kB [ebuild N ] dev-lang/tcl-8.4.9 USE="-threads" 3,414 kB [ebuild N ] dev-lang/tk-8.4.9 USE="-threads" 3,189 kB [ebuild N ] sci-libs/vtk-4.2.6 USE="doc java python -examples -mpi -patented -tcltk -threads" 26,413 kB Total size of downloads: 34,611 kB So, if TCLTK is really optional to VTK, the RDEPENDS list should reflect that. Otherwise, let's get rid of the unnecessary flag. Daniel markusle@gentoo.org 2006-06-12 05:43:04 0000 Hi Daniel, Thank you very much for your report. Tcl/Tk is indeed optional and was incorrectly pulled in by the ebuild in case tcltk is not selected. I've just fixed this in the vtk-5.0.0 ebuild which is the version that I'd strongly recommend you to use since vtk-4.2.6 is fairly broken and will be removed from the tree/replaced by a more recent 4.x version soon. Please let us know if this works for you so I can close this bug. Thanks, Markus daniel.tourde@bredband.net 2006-06-19 13:14:36 0000 It worked indeed. I could build vtk-5.0.0 on a glibc 2.4, gcc 4.1.1 machine (x86). I used cmake 2.4.2 I have no programs to check if vtk works though. The idea is to use paraview, as soon as an ebuild is ready. Will vtk 4.4.x be released as an ebuild as well? markusle@gentoo.org 2006-06-19 15:07:48 0000 Hi Daniel, Thanks for testing and I'll close this bug then. Regarding testing vtk itself, vtk comes with a bunch of example files that you can compile/run yourself and see if things work properly. Regarding a 4.4.x ebuild, please watch bug #135965. Unfortunately, I haven't had time yet to look into this in more detail. Thanks, Markus