<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>134952</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-05-30 12:29 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Stabilizing oooqs-2.1.0</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-06-25 09:54:42 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>suka@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>openoffice@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>amd64@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>suka@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-30 12:29:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This is the OpenOffice.org Quickstarter for KDE, the new version 2.1.0 just entered portage, but there is a good reason to push it to stable that fast: The old one is broken since OpenOffice.org 2.0.2, see bug #133448

So could everyone please test it soonish?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>weeve@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-01 16:50:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Any reason this has a hard dependency on kde-base/ksysguard rather than an or clause for ksysguard or kdebase?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>suka@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-01 23:12:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; Any reason this has a hard dependency on kde-base/ksysguard rather than an or
&gt; clause for ksysguard or kdebase?
&gt; 

Nope, just forgot it, I&apos;ve corrected this now, thanks for noting</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-06 12:12:30 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-22 14:43:30 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-23 09:07:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 done</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>thedude0001@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-25 09:11:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>AMD64 arch tested, looks good, compiles fine, works fine after sitting in the tray for 24h. Good to go stable.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-25 09:54:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 is going to win the would cup!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>