<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>133513</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-05-16 10:36 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>net-dns/avahi-0.6.10: DoS attack / arbitrary code execution</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-05-17 04:46:03 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Security</product>
          <component>Vulnerabilities</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          <status_whiteboard>B1? [noglsa] DerCorny</status_whiteboard>
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>swegener@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>security@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>swegener@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-16 10:36:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>&lt;net-dns/avahi-0.6.10 is vulnerable to the following:

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-2288
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-2289

Didn&apos;t notice this as I bumped the ebuild to 0.6.10</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dercorny@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-16 12:40:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc and x86, please test and stable - thanks

Does this run as root? If not, this is probably only B3</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-16 12:46:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tsunam@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-16 21:51:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>all done on x86 as well ^.^</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-16 22:30:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Thx Joshua, but please don&apos;t close security bugs.

Time for GLSA decision. Impact is rather vague so I tend to vote NO.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>falco@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-17 02:32:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>SA 20022 http://secunia.com/advisories/20022  shows details on the impact.

i think the buffer overflow comes from these lines of code :
http://0pointer.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/avahi-core/rr.c?rev=1209&amp;view=diff&amp;r1=1209&amp;r2=1208&amp;p1=trunk/avahi-core/rr.c&amp;p2=/trunk/avahi-core/rr.c

Remote exec of code is serious, but in this case, the official advisory says it is hardly remotely exploitable.
http://0pointer.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/trunk/docs/NEWS?root=avahi
&quot;We do not consider either of them major security threats. &quot;
&quot;The buffer overflow is hard to exploit remotely, only local users can
become the &apos;avahi&apos; user. In addition the user is trapped inside a
chroot() environment (at least on Linux). &quot;

Concerning the DoS issue (exploitable from a local network only), it is also possible to DoS avahi with inconsistent data. So the DoS issue is not very serious as for me.

I vote NO.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dercorny@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-17 04:46:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>yet another no and closing. Of course, feel free to reopen if you disagree.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>