<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>132931</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-05-10 11:52 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>stabilize app-portage/eix-0.5.5</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-07-12 08:28:59 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>132915</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>genstef@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>ia64@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>jer@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-10 11:52:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Blocks bug 132915

This solves many cache-related problems because of the new metadata cache:
    einfo &quot;As of &gt;=eix-0.5.4, \&quot;metadata\&quot; is the new default cache.&quot;
    einfo &quot;It&apos;s independent of the portage-version and the cache used by portage.&quot;


Please mark it stable.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-10 12:26:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 has been marked stable.
21:23 &lt;+CIA-14&gt; tove * gentoo-x86/app-portage/eix/ (ChangeLog eix-0.5.5.ebuild): Stable on x86 (#132931)

maybe amd64 is also interested in this?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tcort@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-10 13:25:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; maybe amd64 is also interested in this?

amd64 stable.

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-11 01:01:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>There&apos;s a whole bunch of arches out there. Is there a specific reason they were not included?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-11 01:59:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on hppa, FWIW.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-11 13:59:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Even alternative arches like stabilization bugs, I heard :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-12 06:27:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nixnut@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-13 08:58:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on ppc</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>grobian@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-13 09:30:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc-macos stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-14 05:20:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on ppc64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-01 10:29:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ia64: please remove the old version when done, thx.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caster@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-10 02:55:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>How bout mips and x86-fbsd?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caster@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-12 06:17:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Maybe 0.5.6 should be stabilized quickly because bug 137784 is bad with stable portage 2.1</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>agriffis@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-12 08:28:59 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #11)
&gt; How bout mips and x86-fbsd?

with no previous version marked stable, they don&apos;t matter

(In reply to comment #12)
&gt; Maybe 0.5.6 should be stabilized quickly because bug 137784 is bad with stable
&gt; portage 2.1

that&apos;s up to the package maintainer and should be handled in a different bug.

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>